Message from @neat
Discord ID: 405239019312644096
Great one by Zeiger.
Think of how much Loomer's right nostril alone would be worth
But that doesn’t mean that private ownership of capital isn’t better than state owned capital
"Libertarianism, even if it is designed to appeal to the strong-minded conservative type, is still a product of liberal values like equality (‘equality of opportunity’ and ‘don’t tread on me’), liberty (freedom of speech for your enemies) and universalism (‘judge the individual, rather than his race’). We can’t get bogged down with this old ideological baggage. Liberalism must be purged from every crevice of our minds and souls before we are free and empowered to be truly just—which is to say, to dedicate ourselves fully to protecting our family, our nation and our race."
no man should ever earn (((interest))) on his savings, usury is death
I'm a libertarian and I'm against usury
To be clear, I’m not blanket defending libertarianism
The nationalist part of nat soc has value
I reject all jewish libertarianism
Pure 100% Aryan Libertarianism
National socialism allows private property
I rejecc waifus without fetal alcohol syndrome
[REDACTED] COME BACK
interest is a defense against inflation, without usury there would be no such thing as inflation
It’s not like Marxist socialism
I have literally had "pro white" libertarians tell me white people matter only because they care more about private property than brown people, and ingroup preference can come only after private property. Complete spiritual judaism.
[9:54 PM] Sammy Woodchipperz: It’s not like Marxist socialism
Australia’s approach until the late 80s was pretty solid, free trade inside the borders, regulation of external trade. Also note, they had WAP until that time as well.
do you get the irony here
think outside the box
Damn
Sammy pls
you actually don't know what the socialism in national socialism means
The name national socialism was mostly branding
"The folkish philosophy is fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason of the fact that the former recognizes the significance of race and therefore also personal worth and has made these the pillars of its structure. These are the most important factors of its view of life.
If the National Socialist Movement should fail to understand the fundamental importance of this essential principle, if it should merely varnish the external appearance of the present State and adopt the majority principle, it would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground. For that reason it would not have the right to call itself a philosophy of life. If the social programme of the movement consisted in eliminating personality and putting the multitude in its place, then National Socialism would be corrupted with the poison of Marxism, just as our national-bourgeois parties are. " - MK
"It's not the socialism of Marx, but the socialism of..." is the exact same thing I'm doing with "its not the libertarianism of Rand or other jews, it's the libertarianism of..."
Natsoc Germany had several nationalized industries
It’s not just a name
You need to read prussianism and socialism
Sammy think about it
R
E
A
D
S
I
E
G