Message from @yogo
Discord ID: 576062823332053017
where nobles or large landowners can participate inside politics
HMMM
If you have to force democracy in a libertarian capitalism
then it is no longer a libertarian
Don't forget that democracy hasn't even been fully utilized.
So libertarianism is where everyone’s body and philosophy is looked past and it’s not discriminatoryin any way
There hasn't been a state with legitimate elections with 95%+ voter turnout
People just don't care to vote when the state is doing good things for them
Exactly, but you are trailing from the actual point
not at all
If we look at the definition of Libertarianism by google.
```
an extreme laissez-faire political philosophy advocating only minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens.
```
Pre-1800, the monarchy was never absolute and was laissez-faire.
Yeah
No
It was actually a conflict between King and the Church in Western Europe
And a conflict between King and Nobles
Let’s be honest,
Let's be honest. Practical Libertarianism would descend into a monarchy
There has never been a country with a large population that has ever functioned under a hard government
Libertarianism operates under the premise that citizen lives are affected much less than other forms of government.
Except how do you force that?
But who said they were forcing it?
Oh you're not forcing it?
What happens when someone doesn't want to practice libertarianism?
The IDEA is less government control
That's exactly the problem
Asking for lesser government control without forcing it
then they suck it up
or leave
or
they take over the government
and enact more control
which is why libertarianism descends into a monarchy
Someone will rule his property like a King
his neighbors get mad and start to attack this person
And should this person eminently defeat his neighbors, he will be able to rule his neighbor's property
and so on
No.
"muh non-aggression principle"