it is not intrinsic, read your own posts.

And I’m not sure what you think the first example was

Why are you defending fascism? Like why are you working so hard to twist the definition?

I am not defending fascism

This is a simple fact that fascism is a right wing movement

Read my damn posts, jesus christ

Ok, are you defending racism then?

Like why are you working so hard to obfuscate basic facts

Fascism is right wing authoritarianism, period end of story

It’s its definition

Stop accusing me of defending these things, I am simply explaining what they are. I do not agree with either ideology because, if you actually knew what my profile tags meant, you would know I am diametrically opposed to them.

Libertarianism is the polar opposite

Here’s the Oxford English Dictionary:

An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

You are wrong

You have to cherry pick and obfuscate in order to find any evidence to support your theory

Is it because you’re right wing and you want to disavow them?

Like I’m left wing, I’ll say outright that communism is left wing

You can be right wing and admit that fascism is right wing without being a fascist

Fascism is just a right wing philosophy and movement, just deal with it

But I’m watching the debate

No, its because I don't co-opt a preexisting word with a 'revised' definition that both vilifies and entire half of the political spectrum and conflicts with previously established information https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fascism

Please provide a fascist/nationalist party that isn’t right wing, or didn’t arise out of the right wing

he already did you just denied it was fascist because it wasn't right wing

Already gave you an example, learn what the word means. I don't need to repeat myself again simply because you refuse to understand it

“a political system based on a very powerful leader, state control of social and economic life, and extreme pride in country and race, with no expression of political disagreement allowed”

You have not provided a single example

That was from your link- again bringing up race

You brought up a socialist party

How crazy is it to say that a socialist party is fascist, they’re mortal enemies

If you'll notice on google, when you look up Nazism or Nazi Party the brief description from wikipedia on the right of the results will state that it is "far-left", while the wikipedia page itself states it's far-right. Why is this?

Because someone like you trying to argue this altered the page

Why is it conflicting?

Any reputable source says that nazism is rigtbwing

Because someone trying to obfuscate altered it

despite all of the blatant contradictions about the articles themselves showing more left wing elements?

GG @Cobra Commander, you just advanced to level 10!

It’s the article on Nazis dude, it’s gonna be a regularly altered page

What?

I have to go. Fascism is obviously a far right ideology, as any honest historian knows

Your obfuscation if that is highly suspect