Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577278599736852491
Next thing we know we will have a lava reactor
I mean in theory it could work with magma
But we're probably not advanced enough yet
not that it won't work
but it is impractical
Since you'll have to gather it from a volcano
and trying to mess with a volcano's cycle would lead to an early eruption
Not saying we should do it
But we probably could
i love how i cannot have a single debate without somebody bring my religion into it
are u muslim?
God no, im christian
oh
me too
lol
so
nice.
the beach is nice in summer
thank god for the greenhouse
for some reason Islam is somehow a more acceptable religion
If climate change is real how come my house is always a crisp 65?
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 3!
/all lol
/all lol
/all lol
Don't think libtards have thought it through
do peoiple actually think climate chnage isnt real here
No one denies climate change
The debate is over how involved are humans in it
No lmao
The debate is that if climate change is bad what can be done about it
If its not bad then how do others say it is bad
Nuclear reactors have already doomed the planet. Why? Because it's only a matter of time before a natural disaster like an earth quake, solar flare, asteroid impact or volcanic eruption collides with one or more nuclear plants or nuclear waste storage facilities and creates an unprecedented nuclear disaster.
For example, when Yellowstone erupts hundreds of reactors will be destroyed in its blast radius creating unfathomable radiation for millions of years.
Or when a big enough solar flare happens and we have a thousand simultaneous chernobyls/fukushimas.
The earth is too dynamic and chaotic for long term storage of large volumes of nuclear waste to be safe over the thousands of years it takes to become inert.
There are reactors built on fault lines and on volcanic islands for God sakes.
@Techpriest That's the debate on the left, not the debate as a whole. The left debates over what can be done about it while the right debates over whether or not humans are involved in it.
@Handsome Walrus Nuclear energy has still killed less people than all the other sources of energy
It can still be used more effectively we used Thorium or some manage to do Nuclear Fusion
The right DO debate what can be done about it
And they see without damaging the economy the changes are too insignificant