Message from @OCMan101
Discord ID: 524012633972539393
Chernobyl was human error, and nuclear power plants are still less dangerous than coal
Look it up
@OCMan101 Like I mentioned. Nuclear is ironically safe
ye
Chernobyl was a freak once in a lifetime incident
It would basically solve the entire energy crisis but in the past nobody invested in it cos you cant make nukes out of it
Nuclear kills so many less people than fossil fuels
The safety record of nuclear plants is the same as airplanes. They are the safest ways. But when something happens, then the damage and outcry is big.
exactly
Yeah
It's stupid
And I fucking hate that sentiment with a passion
I love Nuclear
We could literally solve the energy crisis with thorium
Yeah but just because a couple incidents were really bad everyone hates it
It can't melt down
It's as common as coal
It produces more energy than uranium
In my Science and Geography classes, I'm always advocating Nuclear
but no one cares about ten times as many miners dying from coal
The biproducts are radioactive for 100 years rather than 2000
It's literally better than uranium in every single way
I want the future they predicted in thr 1950s and 60s
GG @TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh), you just advanced to level 3!
*fun fact: the first nuclear weapon built by the USSR, had its uranium mined from Estonia*
But you can't use it for nukes
now we have nothing except shale oil
And that is why we don't use throium
Which is soo fucking stupid
@The Lemon Yeah, I don't buy that thorium can't meltdown. I call BS on that claim.
No cos it produces 1-2 neutrons per fission reaction
thorium can melt... but nuclear meltdown?
So it can't escalate like uranium can
and thorium can be used to make bombs
Because uranium releases 2-3 per fission reaction
The bi products can
Thorium can't
wiki says u cant make bombs from thorium
yup, calling bullshit
@McBacoon Wiki says that as a "possible benefit" meaning theoretical