@McBacoon the CO2 emission reductions are in millions of tons

The ironic thing is that because solar isn't environmentally feasible in many areas (cited this earlier), places like China are increasing their solar footprint by committing to solar where it isn't feasible.

nice

I totally aggree with nuclear

*agree

Same

who doesent?

I already tried to make that really clear

Nuclear is just an awesome idea

Also yeah china needs to get their shit together

lmao *Chernobyl*

*what a great idea*

<:nice:400522235351400458>

Actually, even when you include Chernobyl, Nuclear Power Plants are some of the safest Power Plants

You heard of thorium?

@The Lemon in a distant future, China wont get their shit together

No honestly you heard of thorium power

Chernobyl was human error, and nuclear power plants are still less dangerous than coal

Look it up

@OCMan101 Like I mentioned. Nuclear is ironically safe

ye

Chernobyl was a freak once in a lifetime incident

It would basically solve the entire energy crisis but in the past nobody invested in it cos you cant make nukes out of it

Nuclear kills so many less people than fossil fuels

The safety record of nuclear plants is the same as airplanes. They are the safest ways. But when something happens, then the damage and outcry is big.

exactly

Yeah

It's stupid

And I fucking hate that sentiment with a passion

I love Nuclear

We could literally solve the energy crisis with thorium

Yeah but just because a couple incidents were really bad everyone hates it

It can't melt down

It's as common as coal

It produces more energy than uranium

In my Science and Geography classes, I'm always advocating Nuclear

but no one cares about ten times as many miners dying from coal

thorium energy would be cool

The biproducts are radioactive for 100 years rather than 2000

It's literally better than uranium in every single way

I want the future they predicted in thr 1950s and 60s