Message from @Techpriest
Discord ID: 569995510430302209
I WANT TAX-FREE TEA
REEEE
Not to mention the british monarch respected the sovereign of the Indians that lived in the North American continent
yet the American colonists said NO I WANT MORE LAND
I will travel beyond the west and claim what is mine
king george had a rule where if you served in the military and you got injured but didnt die you ha to pay money to the crown
based
thats monarchy
makes sense
military training cost a shit ton
the amount it takes to feed you
is ridiculous
and you got "injured"
makes absolute sense to keep the military spending at a minimum
even if you got a job back after the war you still had to pay money
A King does not hypothetically rule in bad taste.
He never does
Bad kings only arise when his or her mental state is disappearing
This doesn't sound very Libertarian
The ideal Libertarian is a monarchy
Then becoming your own King over your property
is the ultimate libertarian dream
the laws of a monarch can only be undone by a monarch
As it should be.
The King does not rule in bad taste must I remind you.
space monarchy is the same as earth monarchy lol
If you had a king in perfect mental state, he would not be a tyrant.
However if you had a president or prime minister in a perfect mental state for a democracy
That's pretty hard to come by though
he wouldnt get shit done
either way
the king represents himself sometimes, and they tended to be egomaniacs and\or pure evil
These are the bad mental state
not to sure about that
Kings rule with a healthy mind at the start
I would rather not risk that
but as they get older and age, their mind deteriorates.
Sounds like it breeds corruption
i dont think any monarchy had to contend with 200 million people in their kingdoms