Message from @CallMeTruckson
Discord ID: 569996092821733406
makes absolute sense to keep the military spending at a minimum
even if you got a job back after the war you still had to pay money
A King does not hypothetically rule in bad taste.
He never does
Bad kings only arise when his or her mental state is disappearing
This doesn't sound very Libertarian
The ideal Libertarian is a monarchy
If the Libertarians are all about ensuring the freedom to life, liberty, and property.
Then becoming your own King over your property
is the ultimate libertarian dream
the laws of a monarch can only be undone by a monarch
As it should be.
The King does not rule in bad taste must I remind you.
space monarchy is the same as earth monarchy lol
If you had a king in perfect mental state, he would not be a tyrant.
However if you had a president or prime minister in a perfect mental state for a democracy
That's pretty hard to come by though
he wouldnt get shit done
either way
These are the bad mental state
not to sure about that
Kings rule with a healthy mind at the start
I would rather not risk that
but as they get older and age, their mind deteriorates.
Sounds like it breeds corruption
i dont think any monarchy had to contend with 200 million people in their kingdoms
>Be British Empire
```
By 1913, the British Empire held sway over 412 million people
```
they arent a real monarchy anymore
Some-what true
The queen does have more power than you think though
a constitutional monarchy
The Queen has legitimacy
the prime minister does not rule on the consent of the people
he serves at the pleasure of the queen which the queen grants her legitimacy to the prime minister
It is not the prime minister who grants you the passport to travel to other countries
It is the Queen
She represents the popular interest to ensure all of the country's needs are met.
They literally just passed a law to heavily regulate copyright in england