Message from @The Lemon
Discord ID: 588771128202231808
The arguments that Yang makes for UBI are completely retarded
*Who knew people would do less bad things if they were given free money*
Free money would promote irresponsibility no?
Legal irresponsibility
But it's obvious you wouldn't rob a gas station
if you were given free money a month
People wouldn't turn to drug dealing if they were given money that let them live
But I doubt UBI will even pass at a Constitutional level
It's basically entitlement welfare
He's not going to get it signed as a law, he wants the UBI ratified in the Constitution
Typing
@Techpriest impossible
I couldnt imagine any new ammendments passing even the ERA
@Techpriest what do you mean "what the fuck does this even mean"
If you actually looked at his website you'd see in depth explanations of all three of those policies
As well as his other 120 or so policies you've entirely failed to mention
UBI would work as a replacement to current welfare programs
@The Lemon it would still be entitlement welfare though, it just replaces pre existing entitlement welfare.
Government says you are entitled to 1,000 dollars a month as a form of welfare
I don’t think I said it makes it bad
Ah k sounded to me like that was what u were implying sorry
I was just wondering why you would need a constitutional amendment to enact entitlement welfare
Instead of the normal channels
Yeah Idk about that either
Yang hasn't said anything about planning to have a constitutional amendment to get it through as far as I know
Probably not
It be better anyways to pass it as a bill since spending is so hard to cut anyways
It’s whatever that other guy said
Tbf I really don't know about how passing new laws in the American system works
I’m just chiming in
House creates spending bills and it moves to be passed from there
Funding the programs of the executive (president)
Like social security etc
Ah k
"should work as a replacement to current welfare policies"
what the fuck
So you will actually LOSE money if you're claiming that