I thought we went over this, old man? Any evidence you find is invalid and biased. That's that.

I mean there's probably some guy called Mohammad who said that

ive lost where u guys are at

Idk

Most domestic terrorist cases are right wing extremists

British Gamer makes a fine point

Christopher Wray said that

oof

Do you know who Christopher Wray is?

I think nature is just made up by a bunch of cunts trying to out-cunt eachother to the top

Sounds like a Hillary shill to me

Anyway, do you have a source that shows that the ADL is a biased source?

Christopher Wray? More like Christopher Gay!

Because if not we can move on and accept the ADL study as fact

... _you_ can.

GG @Admiral, you just advanced to level 2!

Doesn't mean I will.

Now I'll grant you that my sample of it might not be great enough,

For the sake of rational discussion, the ADL study is fact.

but the only time I was exposed the ADL prior to this moment

they were spouting blatant leftist propaganda.

You have yet to provide any source at all

Do you have a source that shows that?

When people are speaking The Truth, they don't need sources

Do you limit yourself to repeating what others say?

@Admiral 😂

Do you not analyse things for yourself and make your own conclusions?

Manifestos by shooters also echo or outright quote more mainstream republican politicians

Such as...

It's obviously a trap

I look to statistics and studies by experts

Experts on matters of opinion?

Sure.

They are left wingers and their manifestos are to throw you off lol

_Tell me what to think, expert, I can't use my own brain_

Such as the Dayton shooter, who used trump’s “send them back” quote

And a right wing extremist sided with Islam in the mosque shooting i just read it somewhere

Again this is not a matter of opinion

We’re talking about crime statistics

Whether or not something is biased?

I don't take Shooter Manifestos seriously. Anyone who thinks that they can get a VICTORY ROYALE by shooting up a bunch of people is just fucked in the head