<:lol:583236542580129825>

🤡

You guys aren't good with complex sentences, sorry - let me help

You're fucking stupid

And full of shit

ah

Interesting how you respond with insults when i did nothing of the sort

classic "can't accept facts so i insult"

You're a fucking idiot, and your existence makes the world worse. I have absolutely no obligation to be courteous to you

he is right

You pussies start squealing like gutted pigs the moment somebody insults you

Cosby i can't say you aren't wrong

Grow some balls

you know can't wait or free speech to be gone

<:lol:583236542580129825>

"you know can't wait or free speech to be gone"

Big thoughts from a big mind

How so? I don't think calling you out on your own bullshit is "squealing".

it was *sarcasm*

<:thonk:583236646858653696>

GG @Solicitor, you just advanced to level 1!

hmmmmmmmmm.....

I'm just saying CNN is not trustworthy

Neither is vox

but

im not saying Fox is either

both are one sided

Well, that's not *all* you said. But okay, not trusting big news corporations isn't necessarily a crime

And I never said Fox was good, just better<:lol:583236542580129825>

ye exactly

I trust Fox *more* because they have provable facts

doesn't mean i trust them

and they didn't push a two year long hoax either

so that earns them a point from me

also trusting big news corps is not a crime you are completely right

just saying that *most* big news corps are one sided

I understand you guys are trying to seem impartial and independently critical about where you get information. But using Fox as an example of one of the "better" sources, going as far as to say "Fox news isn't perfect by any stretch of the imagination but it is far more honest nowadays"

Or "I trust Fox more because they have provable facts"

Implying that other sources don't have provable facts

That's not what I was implying at all