No it doesn't.

?

There's an entirely different word for them within Marxism

...yes it does

Ok

We call them labor aristocrats

Lol ok

They're not the same thing as the bourgeois class

Anyway, I’m gonna get back to work

I highly recommend you listen to mike Duncan

Whats the difference between bourgeois class and labor aristocrats?

You’re smart enough to understand him unlike a lot of the fuckers here

And I think you’d enjoy it

@3v6en8 The bourgeois class uses money to purchase the dead labor of a workers, they then extract surplus value from the value generated by the labor of workers, and they keep that surplus value

A labor aristocrat is just a worker who is disproportionately compensated for their labor

What if a doctor or a lawyer owns a business?

Also known as minor bourgeois

and so their class interest becomes confused and they're more likely to seek the maintenance of capitalism because it provides a high standard of living for them

Then he's petit-bourgeois

petit comme ta bite 😎

Which just means any possessed person who owns a small business, or most exploit their own labor as well as the labor of others to profit

Mademoiselle j'connais le Francais

Im not agreeing with this class interest/class traitor stuff

Football players fit into it

non parle français

ouais pd

Do all business exploit labor?

Yes

They have to in order to make money

especially the majority of businesses

which are small

What about labor?

If they paid you the full value of your labor, they wouldnt make a profit

If they weren't there in the first place you wouldn't make anything

LOL

So if there is no business, the workers would get their value from govt?

Who are untrustworthy

No like

Workers generate their own value

Kleptocratic governments yes yes

Europe had large peasant classes that didn’t even really own land essentially with small noble classes that owned everything. This never was a thing in the United States and that’s why it never got much traction here.