? Or all the high crimes and misdemeanors he committed

I mean this is why the clause is in the constitution- to prevent foreign meddling in an election

By design impeachment is inherently political, so that's within their 'right'

doesn't require a crime, just a collective opinion of the selected doing a bad job

Federalist 65

<:laugh:583238348077006869> Trump administration has stated that he did contact the Ukraine president, but asked for help towards corruption in the US government

Lol

I like the idea that that’s somehow better

it is

Lol wtf

Asking a foreign government to investigate... the US government

That’s literally just treason, are you crazy

Asking the Ukrainian government to investigate their own corruption isn't treason

Even what noodles said is better relatively speaking, though it still isn't good

...

Trump won't get impeached

Right so it’s US corruption that we’re talking about

You think it’s OK to ask another government to investigate the US?

Do you have an ounce of patriotism?

it wont make it passed the senate and Mitch McConnel wont even look at it when it reaches his desk

Impeachment happens in the house.

There is something fishy though about Trump sending Rudy boy to Ukraine

Guliani is not a political lawyer, he'

hes Trumps personal lawyer and should not be involved in this kind of situation

That's not what he asked the Ukraine to do, he asked them to look into corruption in their country. The fact that this may include hunter biden and even robert mueller is not an investigation into the u.s government. Trump stated "I heard a lot of it started in the Ukraine" in regards to the Mueller investigation for instance.

Also agreed Mike

“<<:laugh:583238348077006869>583238348077006869> Trump administration has stated that he did contact the Ukraine president, but asked for help towards corruption in the US government”

Did you miss that dude? That’s what we’re talking about

why would I go to noodles when i could simply go to the transcript? When I responded to that I was simply saying that that's better than explicitly trying to dig up dirt on biden to just win an election even though that's both not good at all and not what was in the transcript

Dude

Yes and i literally jsut explained what i meant

We’re not talking about whether that’s what happened

It’s that you said that would be better

*relatively speaking

as I stated before

Ok, so you withdraw your statement then?

You’re such a fucking liar

You're an idiot who can't understand what i'm saying.

I never said any of this was good.

What we were talking abut