Message from @Mee6

Discord ID: 631291143820148746


2019-10-09 00:42:01 UTC  

He said to look into *why* the prosecution was halted, not to restart it. If he asked him to restart it then you would have more grounds for saying that he did and even then it's iffy.

2019-10-09 00:42:14 UTC  

Now, why would he do that?

2019-10-09 00:42:23 UTC  

Let’s walk through this if you think that’s what happened

2019-10-09 00:42:30 UTC  

"There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it."

2019-10-09 00:42:33 UTC  

this is the quote

2019-10-09 00:42:34 UTC  

That’s already an overly charitable interpretation btw

2019-10-09 00:42:50 UTC  

Ok, so let’s walk through this

2019-10-09 00:43:00 UTC  

If you want an investigation reopened

2019-10-09 00:43:09 UTC  

What are you asking for?

2019-10-09 00:43:43 UTC  

you made the claim that he made a direct request here for biden to be investigated, that's just lie.

2019-10-09 00:43:56 UTC  

It is a direct request for Biden to be investigated

2019-10-09 00:44:17 UTC  

No it isn't

2019-10-09 00:44:21 UTC  

Again, we now know this for certain

2019-10-09 00:44:34 UTC  

You seem to forget that i'm referring to the memo itself

2019-10-09 00:44:40 UTC  

That’s how it was meant, it’s how it was taken

2019-10-09 00:44:47 UTC  

Yes, in the transcript

2019-10-09 00:44:58 UTC  

I’m using other evidence as proof of what we all already knew

2019-10-09 00:45:05 UTC  

No direct means that it has to *say* that. That's what direct means.

2019-10-09 00:45:17 UTC  

What would direct look like?

2019-10-09 00:45:37 UTC  

He’s asking them to reopen the investigation

2019-10-09 00:45:37 UTC  

GG @Platinum Spark, you just advanced to level 24!

2019-10-09 00:45:41 UTC  

That’s literally what he’s doing

2019-10-09 00:45:45 UTC  

"I want you to look into biden and his son" or "i want you to investigate biden" or something along those lines

2019-10-09 00:45:46 UTC  

And again

2019-10-09 00:45:51 UTC  

that is direct

2019-10-09 00:45:59 UTC  

“I want you to look into why the investigation was stopped”

2019-10-09 00:46:12 UTC  

You feel that’s importantly different?

2019-10-09 00:46:21 UTC  

"i want you to look into *why* an investigation was stopped" is not direct

2019-10-09 00:46:28 UTC  

lol ok

2019-10-09 00:46:47 UTC  

If you want to parse it like that

2019-10-09 00:46:55 UTC  

Which is absolutely 100% dishonest

2019-10-09 00:47:15 UTC  

And could not be interpreted as such unless you want to be extraordinarily charitable to trump

2019-10-09 00:47:21 UTC  

Then I won’t stop you

2019-10-09 00:47:42 UTC  

If you truly believe that, you’re retarded or a gop loyalist, take your pick I guess

2019-10-09 00:48:04 UTC  

But that’s fine we can move on. We now know what was meant in the call

2019-10-09 00:48:11 UTC  

here's a hypothetical, if hillary clinton was in his place and asked president zelenskey to look into why an investigation was stopped, would you apply the same logic you are here?

2019-10-09 00:48:15 UTC  

Which was obviously to investigate Biden and his son

2019-10-09 00:48:19 UTC  

Yes

2019-10-09 00:48:33 UTC  

It would be totally inappropriate for Clinton to do that if she were president

2019-10-09 00:49:05 UTC  

You don't set this up with a favor asked in a phone call. You A) Punt it to the Justice Department from the start, or B) Fund your own op ed research.

2019-10-09 00:49:34 UTC  

Correct Nelson, i don't agree with what trump did here