Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 660215007740690432
GG @HeadlessCowboy, you just advanced to level 1!
I can see that
You can also argue that Nancy is scared as fuck
since the Dems think they have the power
when they really dont '
They didn't actually impeach him legally due to the before and not argument
Its minor details they lack
The bot prevented me to fully explain it here though xD
But it is in that google drive link somewhere in the <#604315008490536980> section if you can put the dots together. 🙂
Lol how delusional are you
“Due to the before and not” argument
What does that mean
Okay, let me see if the bot will let me explain it this time xD
All I’m asking is for you to write that sentence
Before HoR was in power, it was not. Thus it never is because the not side always wins. Same with the presidency. Here is why:
The not side exists before it existed and forever backwards in time. It has to be weighed at something greater than 0.
Then due to the 14th amendment: "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" it makes it so time has to be weighed the same. When you have one extreme then one finite sharing a constant, the extreme wins.
More info on logic here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QSzOUEPdlkPd0ppRSCZ1apETJaeLiS1S
Since the president was in power longer, he wins.
I had to shorten it by quite a bit so sorry if it jumps places
Ok, so there’s 2 separate arguments here
First, this “before the house of reps existed it did not” argument is just stupid
It is logic for ya, things before it outlasts it
It did
Before the current one
The current presidency existed before the current HOR therefore it has some supremacy?
That is the flaw with a 4 year term and 2 year terms :/
No. The powers of each are laid out in the constitution
Read the google drive, i beaten many people before you
GG @HeadlessCowboy, you just advanced to level 2!
And the HOR acts as an institutional body. That’s why they don’t re pass every single law every 2 years
No, obviously that’s just stupid
I beat that @Deleted User
Under their authority is easy to beat too
Have you heard of the document?
The responsibilities of the house are laid out in article 1, there’s nothing in the constitution that somehow limits it
The document?
The next is some jurisdictional argument
Then you don't know
Obviously the house has jurisdiction
Beaten many before you lol
What document
I have beaten ph.D