Message from @Yusa

Discord ID: 662377467461500930


2020-01-02 19:27:42 UTC  

Lol

2020-01-02 19:27:48 UTC  

Stream . .Org is not a real source

2020-01-02 19:27:49 UTC  

There are three of them

2020-01-02 19:27:54 UTC  

Please point to an actual source

2020-01-02 19:28:10 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/513098339961798676/662376604722397247/Screenshot_398.png

2020-01-02 19:28:35 UTC  

nancy is an 80s anime character

2020-01-02 19:29:09 UTC  

@Yusa that is an opinion piece

2020-01-02 19:29:16 UTC  

And cites no factual evidence

2020-01-02 19:29:20 UTC  

Do you have a real source

2020-01-02 19:30:07 UTC  

All of your stuff is opinion too @Deleted User

2020-01-02 19:30:25 UTC  

Can be proven wrong

2020-01-02 19:30:33 UTC  

Yeah, I don't know why I can't find it. I was just showing you research I've done to track down that one piece of evidence. I've been to "The Washington Post" and "factcheck" as well.

2020-01-02 19:30:44 UTC  

I was just giving you something to chew on

2020-01-02 19:30:53 UTC  

@HeadlessCowboy when you make a claim, you back it

2020-01-02 19:31:01 UTC  

ok I read that page

2020-01-02 19:31:02 UTC  

He made the claim, therefore he is backing it.

2020-01-02 19:31:03 UTC  

what about it

2020-01-02 19:31:21 UTC  

I read the stream org page, what about it

2020-01-02 19:31:25 UTC  

I backed it with the three documents in here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jny0CZ9knlAtdq6-ZZpgxFRJ_I5ervaq

2020-01-02 19:31:34 UTC  

Hey, I'm so sorry, I have to do something really quick. I'll get back to ya soon

2020-01-02 19:31:38 UTC  

<:honk:583238347124637707> 🐒

2020-01-02 19:31:39 UTC  

please do

2020-01-02 19:31:45 UTC  

@Yusa all legitimate studies on this issue have concluded there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud

2020-01-02 19:32:14 UTC  

```We should cheer Mr. Trump’s call for a thorough investigation, but we must acknowledge his estimate of illicit votes was seat-of-the-pants — which doesn’t mean wrong. A serious investigation is the only way to know.```

2020-01-02 19:32:22 UTC  

That whole page basically says nothing about anything

2020-01-02 19:32:26 UTC  

with that as a conclusion

2020-01-02 19:32:54 UTC  

After that article, the investigation took place. It’s conclusion was the article I posted in which trump’s investigation found no voter fraud.

2020-01-02 19:32:55 UTC  

now let's see what they say about current events, since that's from 2017

2020-01-02 19:33:30 UTC  

Just because they didn't find it, doesn't mean it didn't happen

2020-01-02 19:33:38 UTC  

Just makes it more likely

2020-01-02 19:33:47 UTC  

That’s not the way it works

2020-01-02 19:33:54 UTC  

There are statistical tests to check for this

2020-01-02 19:34:04 UTC  

They aren't fool proof

2020-01-02 19:34:09 UTC  

Like the way they found the fraud in NC

2020-01-02 19:34:11 UTC  

ut oh, this is like expecting creationists to understand geology

2020-01-02 19:34:42 UTC  

@HeadlessCowboy there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis

2020-01-02 19:35:01 UTC  

Are the statistical tests without error?

2020-01-02 19:35:05 UTC  

That being said, remember we’re talking about the claim by trump that there was voter fraud, which was made not only without evidence

2020-01-02 19:35:13 UTC  

@HeadlessCowboy the short answer is yes.

2020-01-02 19:35:20 UTC  

No