Message from @Cuccolover
Discord ID: 677138614836002826
I explained why that's irrelevant already, as well as posting multiple sources actually explaining why what you're saying is silly
They're the biggest contributor to Co2
yes, even surpasses energy
Can't you see it's all framed to fit a political agenda
CO2 amplifies the effects of water vapor, for example. It creates a feedback loop
and then refuse to invest in nuclear energy
You're looking at raw percents of what's in the atmosphere and making it seem like you understand lol. But you don't
Do you know how much of anything there should be in the atmosphere?
No I'm looking at all the factors they purposely left out of the equation and then compared them
What's an acceptable amount of methane? CO2? At what point is it harmful to humans?
if the meat industry is the biggest contributor to Co2 then why is there no campaign against it
You're comparing apples to oranges
isn't that curious?
you don't think that's weird?
if our energy sources should be revamped and we use nuclear energy already, why not invest more into nuclear energy? why revamp the whole thing?
that makes sense to you?
I think there are many campaigns against it lol
Reducing the number of animal products we consume is a cornerstone of most eco movements
no there's literally none in fact most countries purposely overproduce and throw away 1/3rd of it all
and the government even pays for it
Ok there are no campaigns against eating animals
Yep
Most of the meat goes to fast food, you don't think it's curious nobody put a halt on that
it's all distraction
they're distracting you
You really like to move on and ramble when confronted with the issues with your arguments
My mind goes all over the place, I already had that type of convo with Vlad
it's not something I do on purpose
Well, it certainly doesn't help you in your discussions, that's for sure lol
Especially because it fits very closely with cowsrdly weasly tactics that right wingers like to use - we see it here all the time. Sorry to lump you in with those guys, but that's the sad state of affairs
Basically, if I didn't label myself a republican I would've gotten different treatment
ngl, yea you probably would have, but that's because of the experiences they have had w other republicans in this channel
Well, probably - except it's your particular arguments and way of...debating, that seem to be the most offputting
not a good impression lol
I'm trying to see the biggest picture
When people argue about global warming they push one narrative only
There are bigger narratives at play which are ignored
And I wonder why
But see thats like saying when people argue about flat Earth theory, they push one narrative only