Message from @Cuccolover

Discord ID: 677141123898277898


2020-02-12 13:13:59 UTC  

not a good impression lol

2020-02-12 13:14:30 UTC  

I'm trying to see the biggest picture

2020-02-12 13:14:45 UTC  

When people argue about global warming they push one narrative only

2020-02-12 13:14:57 UTC  

There are bigger narratives at play which are ignored

2020-02-12 13:15:11 UTC  

And I wonder why

2020-02-12 13:15:14 UTC  

But see thats like saying when people argue about flat Earth theory, they push one narrative only

2020-02-12 13:15:26 UTC  

Exactly

2020-02-12 13:15:40 UTC  

<:peepobad:538084182644228112>

2020-02-12 13:15:59 UTC  

Well how bout you all support nuclear instead getting spoon fed leftist propaganda to think solar and wind are useful

2020-02-12 13:16:01 UTC  

Is it really about narrative though? That sort of post-modernism makes it seem like scientific study isn’t as important as the politics

2020-02-12 13:16:01 UTC  

GG @abby_ella, you just advanced to level 9!

2020-02-12 13:16:09 UTC  

People who push the flat earth narrative only approach that idea from one angle

2020-02-12 13:16:09 UTC  

GG @Cuccolover, you just advanced to level 15!

2020-02-12 13:16:16 UTC  

levels

2020-02-12 13:16:17 UTC  

and that's their empirical evidence

2020-02-12 13:16:18 UTC  

levels everywhere

2020-02-12 13:16:25 UTC  

🥳

2020-02-12 13:16:43 UTC  

I dont have levels

2020-02-12 13:16:49 UTC  

<:cringe:583238348093652993>

2020-02-12 13:16:57 UTC  

I'm saying scientific studies are segregated from one another to push a political narrative, a scare tactic

2020-02-12 13:17:04 UTC  

It's religion strategy

2020-02-12 13:17:27 UTC  

Yea no shit

2020-02-12 13:17:55 UTC  

Environmentalists are just paid by companies to promote fake science and narratives

2020-02-12 13:18:07 UTC  

But is it really science if they pre-observed other factors weighed in harder than their narrative and purposely left it out of the equation?

2020-02-12 13:18:27 UTC  

Can you give an example of what you’re referring to?

2020-02-12 13:19:14 UTC  

The predictions made 40 years ago about climate change were based on the same models we have today... However the predictions over-exaggerated the results by 20 fold

2020-02-12 13:19:28 UTC  

These scientific studies are still used as a determining factor

2020-02-12 13:19:31 UTC  

I'm asking why

2020-02-12 13:19:51 UTC  

Why is the belief so high if the predictions and results directly conflict one another

2020-02-12 13:20:28 UTC  

And more importantly, why are they targeting the energy supply if that's not the biggest contributor?

2020-02-12 13:20:41 UTC  

Cause people dont genuinely care about accurate results they just care that their lies are being belived by a specific group

2020-02-12 13:21:52 UTC  

But you can only know that if you dig into it

2020-02-12 13:22:08 UTC  

You mean "Merkel"

2020-02-12 13:22:13 UTC  

Everyone wants out of the EU

2020-02-12 13:22:29 UTC  

We don't want Huawei

2020-02-12 13:23:01 UTC  

Chinese are constantly hacking us already, why would we also adapt to THEIR internet

2020-02-12 13:23:32 UTC  

Europe flat out got threatened if we were to say no

2020-02-12 13:23:38 UTC  

What the fuck?