.3% vs population
Both have no evidence
u'll find it very credible
No it's not reasonable to assume that
that swinging
ppl like that
You're just asserting it.
is plausible
Give me proof, a study?
@Kenpachi no evidence of what?
not only plausible
No evidence the 2016 election was faked or rigged
it's **enough**
that's what we're disputing
The 2016 election was fair
right now
lol
no, mate
So you think Facebook ads are ineffective?
every institution ever concluded
Trump certainly doesn’t think so
there was interefence
Effective enough to swing an election? No.
interference*
yes
in states
beyond enough
There's no evidence the 2016 election was unfair, no evidence Trump campaign did anything illegal or i.e coordinated with Russia.
So why does trump buy Facebook ads?
that's plain wrong
Yes I said there was interference but that doesn’t mean the election was not fair
What you’re saying is a lie.
GG @Sophie, you just advanced to level 3!
kenpachi, what?
Lol
INTERFERENCE
WITH THE PROCESS
LITERALLY MEANS
IT WASN'T FAIR
by default
