although they knew what it was

It doesn't matter

There's no evidence to suggest your claims.

"kind of"

Massive disinformation campaign, hacking the DNC

Did that sway .3% of people in Michigan? 1.2% of people in PA?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548 well maybe google is the reason trump didn’t win the popular vote lol

^

I think it’s reasonable to say it did.

Both are crazy statements

if u run the numbers

.3% vs population

Both have no evidence

u'll find it very credible

No it's not reasonable to assume that

that swinging

ppl like that

You're just asserting it.

is plausible

Give me proof, a study?

@Kenpachi no evidence of what?

not only plausible

No evidence the 2016 election was faked or rigged

it's **enough**

that's what we're disputing

The 2016 election was fair

right now

lol

no, mate

So you think Facebook ads are ineffective?

every institution ever concluded

Trump certainly doesn’t think so

there was interefence

Effective enough to swing an election? No.

interference*

yes

in states

beyond enough

There's no evidence the 2016 election was unfair, no evidence Trump campaign did anything illegal or i.e coordinated with Russia.

So why does trump buy Facebook ads?

that's plain wrong