by now

There was communication between Trump campaign and Russia, kind of. None of it was illegal however

criminal conspiracy =/= collusion

@Kenpachi had russia not interfered, Hillary likely would have won the election

"kind of"

> had russia not interfered, Hillary likely would have won the election
No evidence of this.

they knew what content there was

they encouraged the stolen content

to be delivered

they wanted it

they didn't report it

The margins were extraordinarily slim

although they knew what it was

It doesn't matter

There's no evidence to suggest your claims.

"kind of"

Massive disinformation campaign, hacking the DNC

Did that sway .3% of people in Michigan? 1.2% of people in PA?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548 well maybe google is the reason trump didn’t win the popular vote lol

^

I think it’s reasonable to say it did.

Both are crazy statements

if u run the numbers

.3% vs population

Both have no evidence

u'll find it very credible

No it's not reasonable to assume that

that swinging

ppl like that

You're just asserting it.

is plausible

Give me proof, a study?

@Kenpachi no evidence of what?

not only plausible

No evidence the 2016 election was faked or rigged

it's **enough**

that's what we're disputing

The 2016 election was fair

right now

lol

no, mate