Or symptoms become worse.

ok

However this does not equal death.

it hastens death

GG @good luck durruti, you just advanced to level 6!

from a mathematical perspective

if you took the most vulnerable 7% of patients off of any fatality list about a disease

But it does *not equal death*

the disease survival rate would rise astronomically

Death would probably be a small minority of those cases

we're measuring how long they live

A minority of that 23%.

so your argument is that

Survival rates are the % of patients alive after 5 years

a small amount of the population that is the most vulnerable to a disease not being factored into data doesnt matter

because its a small amount

is that right?

It's not based on life expectancy or what not. If we have 200 people, and 190 of them are included in the stat but 10 aren't. And of those 10 7 die

The stat will not change at all.

we have 100 people. 10 of those people are the most vulnerable to a disease.

🤢

all these people are given the disease. the 10 most vulnerable are not treated

🤢 🦮

what do you think the survival rate looks including and excluding those 10?

🛵

Point being those vulnerable people skipping treatment do not see reductions in conditions, around 23% of them do.

That's roughly 2 people, and of those 2 people a small minority die.

That's less than 1.

no

thats roughly 6 people

23% of 27%

Huh?

where are you getting these numbers

27% of people avoid recommended tests

He's getting them from India.gov r3tard

23% of their conditions worsen

27 x 0.23 - 6.21

Shiajbwod0dnj1

Sjen2 smxoicnw

Sjwnw snxofh1

Wjwnw dkofi3w