Message from @Dr. Fortnite
Discord ID: 697535848224391229
a small amount of the population that is the most vulnerable to a disease not being factored into data doesnt matter
because its a small amount
is that right?
It's not based on life expectancy or what not. If we have 200 people, and 190 of them are included in the stat but 10 aren't. And of those 10 7 die
The stat will not change at all.
we have 100 people. 10 of those people are the most vulnerable to a disease.
🤢
all these people are given the disease. the 10 most vulnerable are not treated
🤢 🦮
what do you think the survival rate looks including and excluding those 10?
🛵
Point being those vulnerable people skipping treatment do not see reductions in conditions, around 23% of them do.
That's roughly 2 people, and of those 2 people a small minority die.
That's less than 1.
no
thats roughly 6 people
23% of 27%
Huh?
where are you getting these numbers
27% of people avoid recommended tests
23% of their conditions worsen
27 x 0.23 - 6.21
Shiajbwod0dnj1
Sjen2 smxoicnw
Sjwnw snxofh1
Wjwnw dkofi3w
Wh1 w rnidd
Donald Trump more like 🐐 🐪 🐐 🐫 🐘 🧘♂️ 🏇 🧘♂️ 🧘♂️
Yeah that's 6.21% of 10 people
what
why are you using the 10
What you found is 23% of 27% of people
yeah
Your example
you would use the 100 there
So less than a person sees their conditions worsen
your stat doesnt only represent the poor
And of those a less % die.
literally take my analogy