Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 697534492465823774
Because the vast majority of people are diagnosed.
that the poorest people
niggerrrrr
the ones who are the most likely to die of cnacer
are not in fact dying of cancer
because reasons
Yeah but you aren't proving that, the data I gave was on people with serious med conditions.
This includes everyone, the people who skip because of costs tend to be poorer.
my entire argument is that there seems to be around 7% of the us population that cannot afford adequate medical treatment; these are the people who are at the greatest risk of diseases. these people are left out of survival data thus skewing the numbers up
And of these poorer people, 23% found a reduction in condition.
the data you gave supports my argument
23% of 27% is around 7%
How? My data is arguing the *vast majority* of people consume tests, and 23% of the 27% who *skip* see their condition *worsen*
yes
This worsen does not equal deaths, which is an even lower percentage
the people who dont consume tests
see their conditions worsen in some cases
this is not represented in the survival statistics
And in even smaller cases, die.
what do you think worsened conditions mean in relation to cancer
While that may be true, it does not change the statistic much. Because they're a tiny fraction of the population.
As in stage 1 becomes stage 2
Or symptoms become worse.
ok
However this does not equal death.
it hastens death
GG @good luck durruti, you just advanced to level 6!
from a mathematical perspective
if you took the most vulnerable 7% of patients off of any fatality list about a disease
But it does *not equal death*
the disease survival rate would rise astronomically
Death would probably be a small minority of those cases
we're measuring how long they live
A minority of that 23%.
so your argument is that
Survival rates are the % of patients alive after 5 years
a small amount of the population that is the most vulnerable to a disease not being factored into data doesnt matter
because its a small amount
is that right?
It's not based on life expectancy or what not. If we have 200 people, and 190 of them are included in the stat but 10 aren't. And of those 10 7 die
The stat will not change at all.