Message from @rona man

Discord ID: 683893676098715683


2020-03-02 04:19:01 UTC  

also political, as turkey is doing to hide armenian genocide mass graves

2020-03-02 04:19:36 UTC  

my question is too weak, though. i'm having difficulty thinking of a way to narrow it down to something more divisive

2020-03-02 04:20:37 UTC  

what would be the environmental impact of a mass grave? i know our bodies decompose well off but in terms of just tossing a few thousand into one area

2020-03-02 04:20:45 UTC  

So you can still better your question?

2020-03-02 04:20:53 UTC  

that can't be that good for an ecosystem surely right?

2020-03-02 04:21:09 UTC  

@rona man depends how deep i guess

2020-03-02 04:21:49 UTC  

well, there are syrians who built farms over mass graves from the ottoman empire, so it's not that bad

2020-03-02 04:22:07 UTC  

and serbians grew pine trees over some mass graves to cover them up

2020-03-02 04:22:59 UTC  

societal impact would be deep for most people i'd imagine, take a look at a picture of a concentration camp mass grave and dread more often than not sets in

2020-03-02 04:23:16 UTC  

my problem is with my question, it's hard to argue against an established science

2020-03-02 04:23:43 UTC  

"CAN it be utilized scientifically to determine..." is my issue

2020-03-02 04:24:14 UTC  

it obviously can because it has; mass graves are very different depending on the circumstances, like a plague grave versus a genocide grave

2020-03-02 04:24:30 UTC  

i need a better question to analyze

2020-03-02 04:26:49 UTC  

there are ethical concerns in anthropology about false findings, and forensic science, about doctored results i guess

2020-03-02 04:28:06 UTC  

ask the same question differently

2020-03-02 04:28:16 UTC  

"can" is redundant

2020-03-02 04:28:41 UTC  

would "is" be better?

2020-03-02 04:28:48 UTC  

the science in practice works, its almost like

2020-03-02 04:29:01 UTC  

youre questioning its credibility

2020-03-02 04:29:07 UTC  

if you get what im saying

2020-03-02 04:29:18 UTC  

"CAN it be utilized" it can and it has

2020-03-02 04:29:59 UTC  

Ask as if you're presenting forensic anthropology to an audience that doesn't know what it is

2020-03-02 04:30:23 UTC  

to be fair, a lot of them probably don't.

2020-03-02 04:30:35 UTC  

for me

2020-03-02 04:30:58 UTC  

the word "can" questions if something is able to do something

2020-03-02 04:31:10 UTC  

its like if you were about to pay for food and the cashier asks

2020-03-02 04:31:18 UTC  

"are you sure you can pay that"

2020-03-02 04:31:39 UTC  

so should i ask "Is forensic anthropology utilized scientifically to determine if a mass grave is the site of a human rights violation?"

2020-03-02 04:31:56 UTC  

I'd say more like

2020-03-02 04:31:57 UTC  

That's a similar argument but carries a lot different weight

2020-03-02 04:32:11 UTC  

and the cashier asks "are you sure I can ingest your meaty urethrastick"

2020-03-02 04:32:15 UTC  

and you say yes

2020-03-02 04:32:15 UTC  

"How" or "Why" it's able to

2020-03-02 04:32:28 UTC  

It's a yes or no question unfortunately

2020-03-02 04:32:34 UTC  

hmm

2020-03-02 04:32:54 UTC  

well

2020-03-02 04:33:05 UTC  

well, not yes/no, but agreeable/disagreeable

2020-03-02 04:33:06 UTC  

yes or no

2020-03-02 04:33:13 UTC  

can still works in that sense

2020-03-02 04:33:23 UTC  

if you were to write it like

2020-03-02 04:33:41 UTC  

"can so so work in this applied area, of course it does" but