and we killed like 13 people over 40 years

anyway offtopic

I don't think my state has the death penalty.

Not sure though.

the philosophy of neutrality is a lack of moral

HOWEVER

if you're seeking neutral as in balance

then pragmatic is a better term to use

The way I view it, when making a decision I act as an atheist simply because when you let your religion influence that, it can cloud the results.

For example, if there was a vote on state religion,

You let your lack of religion influence that as well

On one hand I practice my religion,

However I would act as an atheist in that moment.

And vote for no state religion.

ergo throw away your morals and become based

If state religion allows everyone to be happier

then do it

if banning a state religion allows everybody to be happier than u do it

Doesn't seem like a wise thing to me.

you dont need to be an atheist or religious person to know what is based

State religions,

Historically lead to really fucked up stuff.

Taken out of context.

If you take Islam from the 1000s and apply it today's standard

"holy shit, TAXES ON NON-MUSLIMS?"

"WHAT THE FUCK GUYS"

"WHAT??? PUBLIC STONING ON SINFUL PEOPLE?"

Yeah, so under religious law that happened.

Like Plato once said, different forms of government exist on different forms of context.

And under modern religious law Saudi Arabia still hangs gay people.

And under religious law, typically bad things happen.

Only because our context change.

I would suggest culture based governments,

Not religious based governments.

those are called ideologically-based government

and i rather not have another hitler or stalin again

Not what I mean.

Stalin was too based for his country

Basically cultures function different.

For example,

Among Europeans,