salutations

Good evening

@Dr.Cosby Why are you such a troll? People are here wanting to have legitimate debates, and here you are, bashing and insulting anyone who dares go against what you are for, or is for what you’re against. You are such a hypocrite.

@James McKinnon Show me where I'm a hypocrite, you sack of shit. You have proven yourself to be indoctrinated with idiotic beliefs and capable only of parroting superstitious garbage. I have no respect for you or your ideas, and I will treat you accordingly.

Just yesterday you called me a troll for telling you nothing but facts. I was never rude, and I never intentionally bashed or insulted anyone. And here you are, bashing and insulting me and others for what we do or do not believe in. I’ve come here for a debate. It seems to me you’re here to do nothing but tear people down or discard their beliefs, should they differ from your own. You have done nothing but shown me that you are a troll. @Dr.Cosby

Being disrespectful is trolling now? Hahaha

Try again.

Intentionally spreading false information and promoting discrimination, bigotry, and anti-science is what you're guilty of.

@Dr.Cosby Discrimination? Bigotry? Anti-science? Really. Wow.
You are not just being disrespectful. You are literally telling people REPEATEDLY to kill themselves because they don’t go along with what you believe. Would someone truly looking for a legitimate and civilized debate do so?

GG @James McKinnon, you just advanced to level 3!

@James McKinnon You couldn't show me where I was a hypocrite. Now fail to show me where I'm repeatedly telling people to kill themselves.

You fucking bag of garbage

You're a small person with an even smaller mind.

Go to the trump chat and you can clearly see yourself telling someone to kill themselves. Just now you’ve told me to choke on some kind of potion. That’s twice in the same day you’ve told someone to kill themselves. @Dr.Cosby

You're an idiot and a troll, I don't want to engage with your stupidity

<:facepalm:583246304151470090>

Ok, fine. Have it your way. If you’re anything like your profile picture or your nickname I sure as hell wanna stay away from you.

You’re a hypocrite, a troll, and an ignorant leftist who refuses to accept facts or own up to their mistakes. @Dr.Cosby

You don't trust doctors and scientists

<:peepodumb:538083903835996176>

I trust doctors and scientists who do their damn job at saving lives.

<#542037236053442561> gents?

@James McKinnon Google is for sore losers.

I won't take statements and facts like a man because I am a devout Trump supporting Christian.

@Dr.Cosby You're the saltiest disgrace ever to walk in your country!

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-xi-jinping-is-attacking-religion-in-china-2018-11

@WHITTYZ13
Unproven Theories:
non-life > life > male and female > reproduction > helpful mutations > DNA increase > natural election to new 'kinds' > progress from simple to complex

Let's step back into reality.

The following is impossible:
non-life > life > male and female > reproduction > helpful mutations > DNA increase > natural election to new 'kinds' > progress from simple to complex

Don't be fooled with eloquent words, God has made His presence and existence simple.

Since the fall of man, and so, the separation from God, and our attraction to evil, all has gone to a deteriorating state (death).

Another very important flaw to be taken into account with athiesm is the lack of a catalyst. There must be a catalyst throughout all of these phases. The mere foolishness that nothing is something, and that nothing had a catalyst to spark it to enact something, while it is still nothing itself is mind bogling.

The fact alone that nothing had no catalyst, that alone disproves athiesm. What should we mention about intelligence, morals, entropy, thermodynamics, physics, 'push-pull', etc.

God's existence is clearly seen, yet having denied Him as disobedient children, they have gone astray, rejecting all manner of truth to follow after their own lusts. Desiring to have no part in Him they have rejected their first Love.

What an insane ramble

I hope you're on some strong drugs man

I have no idea what you're talking about

Those "signs of god" is your interpertation of an event without providing evidence to support your claim

Now i'm not saying that there might not be a god

I'm saying that the existence of god is a pointless debate

Cause it's not within the realm of scientific research

It's more in the philosophical realm if anything

But even in philosophy it is said that if you can't test the validaty of a claim then it's not worth the debate

How would anyone go about testing the existence of a god?

@James McKinnon Wrong the Big Bang was a set of conditions, it was an expansion. Radiation isn't a force and it isn't constantly in motion around us. Yeah it can be measured, do you know what carbon dating is?

Law of Entropy only works on a closed system btw

@Dr.Cosby my ass

The law of social entropy can work with a closed system such as Earth. And carbon dating is just relative to other carbon datings. So it's only as accurate as another carbon dating measurement is which in turn is also only as accurate as another one.