because you can't prove it in any way

ye

and if u believe philosophy

@Missy *saying

u are religious

Where's your argument for it?

lol

@chuckayy *You

That was an intentional excessive letter

@Deleted User I thought you knew Russel's teapot

To demonstrate I was stretching it out in my head

this is the equivalent of arguing against religion with a 17th century christian

its a waste of time team

@waiting for silksong I did.

^^^^

Maybe you just didn't understand it?

^ to chuck

If Christians are wrong, then how did everything come to be?

@waiting for silksong Nah. I do. It's funny because Bertrand Russell was an atheist

@Cheeki Breeki allah

Throttles

lol

It's used against people who shift the burden of proof onto atheists.

I don't think he would say there is no possibility of god existing

the burden of proof is on either if they are being assertive

He was a positive atheist.

and given lack of evidence either side is simply theoretical

@Deleted User this is semantics atheist and agnostic are interchangable sometimes

its fine to have a theory but having belief in something without evidence is called: faith

@waiting for silksong He argued against a metaphysical being.

So you're telling me that you've studied philosophy but are saying that we have to disprove something instead of prove?

@chuckayy Are you a weak or strong agnostic?

I'm 99% sure that he never argued that there could not possibly be a god

Stop using metaphysics God fucking dammit

i lift mad weight

strong

You don't understand the word

@waiting for silksong He did. Dude you can search this

Nazi can you go into vc?

Wasn't he converted to a religion later in his life lol?

You're citing someone who changed his mind?????