Message from @Missy

Discord ID: 608711785565913139


2019-08-07 17:21:37 UTC  

No one:
Absolutely no fucking one:
Throttles: ACCORDING TO THE NONEXISTENT PRINCIPLES OF METAPHYSICS WHICH I AM UNABLE TO PARAPHRASE YOU ARE INCORRECT

2019-08-07 17:21:44 UTC  

Dumb. ^

2019-08-07 17:21:58 UTC  

It's funny because metaphysics is used to also support the existence of a metaphysical being

2019-08-07 17:22:06 UTC  

Hop into vc

2019-08-07 17:22:08 UTC  

What the fuck are you sayinnggggg

2019-08-07 17:22:10 UTC  

Or get your friend in vc

2019-08-07 17:22:14 UTC  

laws of logic arent proven to be reality

2019-08-07 17:22:25 UTC  

no philosopher will say that they are reality

2019-08-07 17:22:30 UTC  

ye

2019-08-07 17:22:31 UTC  

Spamming???

2019-08-07 17:22:36 UTC  

because you can't prove it in any way

2019-08-07 17:22:39 UTC  

ye

2019-08-07 17:22:44 UTC  

and if u believe philosophy

2019-08-07 17:22:45 UTC  

@Missy *saying

2019-08-07 17:22:46 UTC  

u are religious

2019-08-07 17:22:49 UTC  

Where's your argument for it?

2019-08-07 17:22:53 UTC  

lol

2019-08-07 17:22:54 UTC  
2019-08-07 17:23:06 UTC  

That was an intentional excessive letter

2019-08-07 17:23:07 UTC  

@Deleted User I thought you knew Russel's teapot

2019-08-07 17:23:18 UTC  

To demonstrate I was stretching it out in my head

2019-08-07 17:23:19 UTC  

this is the equivalent of arguing against religion with a 17th century christian

2019-08-07 17:23:23 UTC  

its a waste of time team

2019-08-07 17:23:23 UTC  
2019-08-07 17:23:24 UTC  

^^^^

2019-08-07 17:23:30 UTC  

Maybe you just didn't understand it?

2019-08-07 17:23:31 UTC  

^ to chuck

2019-08-07 17:23:47 UTC  

If Christians are wrong, then how did everything come to be?

2019-08-07 17:23:50 UTC  

@waiting for silksong Nah. I do. It's funny because Bertrand Russell was an atheist

2019-08-07 17:23:55 UTC  
2019-08-07 17:23:59 UTC  

Throttles

2019-08-07 17:24:01 UTC  

lol

2019-08-07 17:24:18 UTC  

It's used against people who shift the burden of proof onto atheists.

2019-08-07 17:24:21 UTC  

I don't think he would say there is no possibility of god existing

2019-08-07 17:24:32 UTC  

the burden of proof is on either if they are being assertive

2019-08-07 17:24:37 UTC  

He was a positive atheist.

2019-08-07 17:24:41 UTC  

and given lack of evidence either side is simply theoretical

2019-08-07 17:24:53 UTC  

@Deleted User this is semantics atheist and agnostic are interchangable sometimes

2019-08-07 17:24:56 UTC  

its fine to have a theory but having belief in something without evidence is called: faith

2019-08-07 17:25:07 UTC  

@waiting for silksong He argued against a metaphysical being.

2019-08-07 17:25:10 UTC  

So you're telling me that you've studied philosophy but are saying that we have to disprove something instead of prove?