we're talking about *what is possible* and if the existence of god is *possible*, so this is irrelevant. we're talking from the true perspective that you don't know anything except for what you are sensing and thinking at the moment. yes the laws of physics are *almost certainly in line with reality in one way in another*, but you can't know for certain.
Also just to make it clear, I'm not really *open* for say of the idea of a god existing but it is undeniably possible, but there is no rational reason to believe in god just like there is no rational reason for me to believe that there's a glowing hippo fairy standing on my back.
^ Theory of evolution is proven. To argue against that is stupid.
@waiting for silksong Do you think moral facts exist? You're limiting yourself to empirical evidence, is there anyway that you can argue against that the laws of physics are not in line with reality? Saying there is a possibility without reasoning is stupid.
Again, where is the reasoning for this, if metaphysical forces are actually evident in reality?
While science deals with specific situations, metaphysics deals with general matters. For example, whilst a scientist talks about the laws of nature, a metaphysicist will study what the characteristics are to make that statement to qualify as a law.
it seems more likely to me that instead of a scientific theory with hundreds of peer reviewed studies including the targetted tracking of numerous species that has a logical explanation that is evident in nature that a man in the sky made the bird because he dided
