But that kinda applies to doing anything
The idea is that there is certainly an optimal temperature range that provides a criminogenic effect
and it's generally pretty hot
Now it's obviously not the sole cause of crime but it very well could be enough to push someone over the edge in certain situations
"Death is the solution to any problem. No man, no problem" - Joseph Stalin
I see, but that kind of belongs more in <#518779466512596992>
nope
Yes
this is probably the most appropriate channel for it
You're talking about how temperature effects crime rates and there's a channel specifically talking just about the temperature of the climate
and you do realize this is <#523834972126052352> right?
we were talking about punishment, then we started talking about crime, temperature is just a component of the conversation on crime
we are talking about the philosophy of crime essentially
and punishments as well
Right but which channel it belongs it is determined by which area of knowledge something has to do with
Hi there
People who know religion and philosophy don't know about crime rates and temperatures
I mean hey there
well they should
it's common sense shit
People in the climate-debate would be more educated on the subject
no they wouldn't
Yes because it's closer to their area of knowledge
no it's not at all
yes it is
when you get a PhD you become a doctor of philosophy in your perspective field
philosophy is not just like plato
Are you willing to bet that if I took a survey of philosophy courses vs climate courses I would see a lower percentage of the climate courses talk about the effect of temperature on crime rate than the philosophy ones?
retard
wow, very convincing argument
Excellent rebuttal
Except they could talk about the climate
in philosophy
why is it that extreme weathers lead to cynic philosophy?
meanwhile mild climate leads to a more optimistic philosophy
simple
@Techpriest are you Christian?
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 6!
no
Shame
I accidentally locked myself out of my house
