Message from @Draxus
Discord ID: 633717444179001376
and not all of them are held with equal weight, and their veracity depends very much upon who recorded it, as most are the result of oral tradition, which wasn't turned into written literature till the originators of the story had died
Reading the source for a Hadith is like reading the transcript for a game of telephone
And for this reason, almost no Muslims, at least scholars and educated Muslims, take all hadiths to be accurate, and some even reject hadiths entirely and just use the Quran
And sex with slaves is permissible in Islam, Allah condones this
But you also aren't permitted to have sex with a slave against her will, and there are hadith about the punishing of men for raping slaves
Granted I think it's very difficult to prove or disprove if a slave wants to have sex with her master. There's an inherent power dynamic and threat of violence which puts her in a position where she's likely to say yes against her wishes
Hence the concept of weak and strong hadiths
TFW actually it's just "The Hadith" and it's a guiding book and all Muslims believe in all of them
<:peepodumb:538083903835996176>
<:kek:538084230408830987>
Before you engage in a debate with a non-muslim
You should make them do a test
It's what I did with golden on philosophy
You'd make him take a philosophy test to prove competency?
@fuck12moredeadcops Just a few questions to see if he knew basic stuff
That’s hilarious but necessary when you’re dealing with actual morons.
@Deleted User You don't understand what its like being religious so you have no say in what's right or wrong in religion sherlock.
Throttles is also the guy that dismisses pure philosophical teachings from the past and uses revised version to basically prove how his points hold a higher standard than anyone else lol. He is known to lie in most things he says in a debate.
sad but true
Technically speaking you make yourself the moron for trying to debate a fascist because all they do is they play on words. When people counter-argue and dismantle their facts, they change the topic and even tactics if they need to.
The guy sees what he wants to see either way, and runs in circles until he's comfortable with moving onwards. It's absolutely impossible to have a reasonable dialogue with a person like that.
It's definitely amusing though.
Religious retards
No not really. @!GoldenKingship!
>pure philosophical teachings from past
No I don't.
You are just as bad
Believing things without a lick of evidence is in no way "just as bad" as...not...lol
One day, being "religious" will disqualify you from being able to vote. And a day not long after that, being "religious" will earn you a spot in the loony bin.
100%.
Keep calm and Ave Maria. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J1170l4sZE
@Dr.Cosby not being able to vote hmmmm...
lmfao
ok
It's already happening.
losing their voting rights is just a part of them losing other rights