Message from @Khaine
Discord ID: 677741396605796362
Also, if soldiers commit violence against civilians, I would call that aggression
the only way to properly class murder without a lingering contradiction, is with authorization.
I dont see what is so contradictory about defining murder by the aspect of aggression
military is always going to be your screwball.
Collectives will always be hard
Not military specifically
mafia?
I mean any individual mafia member tends to be aggressive
Theft is a form of aggression, just directed at one's property as opposed to their person
mafias by nature are predatory
Agreed, theyre pretty aggressive
Blackwater?
Theft is directed towards a person, as one's property is an extension of their self ownership @Sauropithicus
Exactly
or any mercinary
But its not exactly their person
mercinaries are where things get SUPER grey.
But Id definitely agree with you @Khaine
yeah I just need examples of their actions
Their property isn't itself their person, but it's an extension of such
Thats fair, I understand
and i agree wholeheartedly
I am a fellow anarcho
Based
Idk why any actual anarchist would like an ancap
@wuzamarine Collectives are a little tricky but you could always boil it down to the actions of individuals and find whether those specific actions are aggressive are not
Anarchocapitalism is real anarchy
@Sauropithicus
Here's a good one, murder or killer?
Muslim Jihaddist
it really isn't
Anarchism is not the belief in the abolition of hierarchy, archos means ruler. Hierarchies are natural creations that when the world is left to itself, it is sorted out into
Jihaddist is aggressive
Capitalism isn't natural
Unless someone kills his family or something first
Capitalism is natural
capitalism is unnatural because it unrealistically restricts the states ability to enforce what people want
The state is not the people
Read anatomy of the state and wake the fuck up already, its like 50 short ass pages
the operation of land for one's own interests is only allowed because people allow them
the state isn't the people now but that doesn't have to be the case
A third of the pages are footnotes anyways bc Rothbard was such a crazy ass intellectual