Plants are asexual THEREFORE NOT MALE OR FEMALE
LMAO
hm
<:kek:538084230408830987>
it didn't send a link
``` blogs ```
how strange
has to use blogs like lefties
sides lost
Guyss
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sa-visual/visualizing-sex-as-a-spectrum/
what if a blog cites sources then hm
fucks sake man
what if a blog cites sources
so why not link the source
instead of the blog
Links are lame
because the blog explains the sources??????
>blog explains the source
why not just read the post
lmao
but i want the source
why would i need someone to spoonfeed me the source when I can interpret it on my own
You shouldn't really need a blog to interpret something for you, js
Yea
the source probably said gender is like a spectrum from 0 to 1
and then the blog is saying GENDER IS A BIG SPECTRUM
RANGING FROM MALE, FEMALE, FURRY, TRANSGRNDER, ASEXUAL
@quinnn interesting read
@dandelion it's a shame these fucking goons won't pay it any notice
The article argues that gender and sex Are diffrent
yeah
ofc there are
Whoa there, wait a second. I've just now joined so I don't appreciate being called a goon
no one is arguing that sex and gender are different
Biologidal and self expression
We are arguing there is only
TWO GENDERS
TWO SCOOPS
TWO TERMS
