Message from @Billcat

Discord ID: 578884251160936449


2019-05-17 09:54:14 UTC  

imo

2019-05-17 09:54:42 UTC  

Also I think the fetus being alive discussion is pointless because whether it is alive is not scientific in basis (Since all single celled organisms are technically "alive") and x y z is just an arbitrary standard to whether it is alive i,e heartbeat, brain waves, etc

2019-05-17 09:55:11 UTC  

it's not murder if it's not alive

2019-05-17 09:55:42 UTC  

but i mean yeah

2019-05-17 09:55:50 UTC  

that's the reason we have diff views

2019-05-17 09:55:56 UTC  

My view is that a zygote already contains the blueprints for a whole human being, it's a potential of a life. Potential is defined as "**having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future.**" A zygote, if left untouched, has the capacity to become or develop into something into the future, therefore the potential for an independent human to exist begins at conception.

2019-05-17 09:56:02 UTC  

But yea, that is why we have differing views

2019-05-17 09:56:30 UTC  

potential for a life ≠ a life tho

2019-05-17 09:56:43 UTC  

To me, there is no heaven or hell, or any sort of afterlife, so this is the once chance we have at a life, and to deny that is morally apprehensible to my view

2019-05-17 09:57:17 UTC  

That is true, potential for a life does not always mean there will be a functional human at the end. I would argue that abortion should be permitted in medical circumstances

2019-05-17 09:57:31 UTC  

The mother's life being at risk, or the baby being severely impaired or deformed

2019-05-17 09:57:41 UTC  

yeah

2019-05-17 09:58:12 UTC  

wait isn't you supporting abortion when the baby is severely impaired kinda contradictory to the point of pro-life

2019-05-17 09:58:17 UTC  

that a fetus is a life

2019-05-17 09:58:26 UTC  

and unless it harms another life

2019-05-17 09:58:43 UTC  

hmmmm

2019-05-17 09:58:52 UTC  

sounds like eugenics with extra steps

2019-05-17 09:59:03 UTC  

sounds like slavery with extra steps

2019-05-17 09:59:09 UTC  

shut up

2019-05-17 09:59:15 UTC  

😤

2019-05-17 09:59:20 UTC  

Yes and no, do I think all those with impairment or deformity should be aborted? No, however I think there needs to be some sort of scale formed in which a fetus is rated on it's viability for life

2019-05-17 09:59:33 UTC  

defintley eugenics with extra steps

2019-05-17 10:00:49 UTC  

No, because eugenics believes in killing off groups of people or preventing them from reproducing to "preserve the human race" or some nonsense

2019-05-17 10:01:27 UTC  

um what

2019-05-17 10:01:41 UTC  

that bad

2019-05-17 10:02:05 UTC  

I'm saying that aborting a fetus that would die within hours of being born would not be against my moral standing since that potential for life isn't there, since it is a 100% known fact that this fetus will not have a life

2019-05-17 10:02:18 UTC  

Or a fetus that would 100% be a stillborn

2019-05-17 10:02:20 UTC  

from the eugenics pov, gay people help stop overpopulation

2019-05-17 10:02:33 UTC  

ohh ok

2019-05-17 10:02:33 UTC  

Yea eugenics is trash

2019-05-17 10:02:42 UTC  

lol

2019-05-17 10:05:17 UTC  

i really like those images of anti abortion ads that say "who will be the next police officer" its basicly two birds with one stone

2019-05-17 10:05:18 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 7!

2019-05-17 10:05:23 UTC  

dead cops and abortion rights

2019-05-17 10:06:05 UTC  

ok this has been a good chat

2019-05-17 10:06:12 UTC  

with everyone except josh

2019-05-17 10:06:16 UTC  

gtg

2019-05-17 10:06:17 UTC  

bye

2019-05-17 12:06:48 UTC  

Ha, libs

2019-05-17 12:51:17 UTC  

I don't think ashnaa is really a men's right activist...seems like a diet coke feminist to me...

2019-05-17 12:55:39 UTC  

@Deleted User Wait a second buddy, I remember you from another server