Message from @Pelth
Discord ID: 633435519983943701
I.E mesomorph, ectomorph,
you don't have to have them at the forefront in your mind though is the thing, they're never in mine but I can still find them
You're only going to find them easily if some libtard made an article or something about it
not if you just read random research experiments like I do
and read old shit
@Pelth are you a racial supremacist
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 8!
i'm not accusing you of anything
i'm just asking
<:waitwhat:583236680903950355> you can find sources on most topics on search engines, i don't even understand that logic
you literally can't
you can
you can also use keywords to narrow down the search
if you remember something remotely relevant or close to the study then
yeah you can
university based databases are going to be a lot better but there are plenty of things you will have a difficult time finding on those
many times you have to go into physical libraries
you clearly have never had to do actual reseach for anything
google scholar has some things but it's pretty limited
Using the internet =/= no research, again that assertion doesn't make sense.
that's why the material is not publicly accessible
Sure, still doesn't negate the fact that there are *also* sources on various search engines for most things.
not really
Yes there are. I'm not even commenting on validity or anything, the fact is that the internet has at least a few sources on most things.
Maybe because you think that, that's why you always want easily accessible sources.
But it's an incorrect thing to think
i never stated I wanted only easily accessible sources
Many sources I use are from physical books
I sometimes provide the book names
The slow twitch, fast twitch muscle thing for example is commonly accepted
and backed up by empirical evidence
as is the hormonal thing amongst races
Observation of phenotypical features and understanding the underlying biological forces that produce them is a skill that can't easily be taught. I can't teach it to you, you have to learn it on your own.
Biology and Crime by C.R. Jeffery is quite good.
Book
I don't really care about university databases that you use nor was I saying that they're worse than the internet, as I wasn't addressing that. Again, you can also find sources for things on a variety of search engines and you haven't substantiated an argument against this claim other than a comment on my thinking, which isn't an argument and just a deflection. Physical books also have a tendency to become obsolete after a few years.
The idea that they become obsolete is false. Most of the time they do not.
It depends on what the topic is
Siege by James Mason is not obsolete
🤬