Revolution and Socialism IS synonymous.

```
a forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favor of a new system.
```

Capitalism was once revolutionary so therefore capitalism used to be Socialism

When Socialism doesn't overthrow the current status quo for socialism

I could argue for a socialist economical system without a revolution?

Yes

You can argue doesn't mean you'll get it

Get the fuck out of my race channel. Go to <#513098448640278539>

And, Capitalism formed through revolution, yet, Capitalism was not Socialism

Socialists are sub-humans and therefore are race

Capitalism did not form through revolution because capitalism according to commies existed naturally

I mean here in Canada for example, we shifting to a more socialist view of the economy

And without a revolution

You are not even remotely close to socialist

Show a source @Techpriest

You can go policies by policies

You undervalue the native Canadians

like crazy

Im talking the economical system

You are essentially America Lite

No

You're not socialist in Canada

Without having to spend military, you get to spend on social systems instead

It's on the left

Tax rate is quite high

Many public services are subsidized

Still not Socialist

Im not saying were socialist

but were shifting

so you're not socialist

???

Im claiming your nation can become socialist slowly

without a revolution

But they're not socialists

Why the fuck would you argue for a revolution

@Techpriest I still need a source showing that individual ownership of the means of production has always existed

so you can't claim this peaceful shift as a transition to socialism without Canada even becoming socialist in the first place

I'm saying it's more likely to happen that your revolution

Can you be realist for a moment?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Civil_War

Are you really arguing for a revolution?