Message from @Dr.Cosby
Discord ID: 632491782818627584
@Alexstrasza He says drugs, which can mean any number of drugs including marijuana, heroin, lsd etc
I claimed that whites and blacks smoke specifically marijuana and just marijuana at the same rate yet blacks get arressted for smoking weed more than whites do. **not** whites and blacks do **drugs** at the same rate
had I said that instead, then yes, I would have been wrong according to AltHype
and it’s not a self report thing
they’re not going to people’s houses asking if they do weed or not
it’s about black people getting arressted for smoking weed more while whites who also smoke weed at the same rate yet get arressted less for the same offense
just be a great aryan and you’ll be fine
Genes affect your intelligence in very complex ways - and the impact of environmental factors is clearly far more substantial. By repeatedly bringing up genetics as a major factor in white vs black crime rates, you are being ignorant at best or echoing eugenicists at worst.
It is not helpful to focus on statistically small differences in trends for differences in IQ, for example - when there are clearly FAR more important factors at play.
Genetics affect how well you can play golf, but there are other more important variables to consider whether or not somebody becomes a professional golf player. Like being wealthy. Are black people genetically inferior to white people when it comes to golf? Lol
Twin studies suggest that between 40 and 80% of the variance in IQ is linked to genetics. This research suggests that genetics may play a larger role than environmental factors in determining individual IQ.
All the research I’ve read points to genes having a size-able impact
Okay, show some of this research then
I can see some of what you're saying here
>wikipedia
Very reliable source
It appears that genetics have a stronger effect on IQ than I thought. Still, IQ is a flawed measure of intelligence and there appear to be many "caveats". I also think it's a stretch to extrapolate this to white vs black crime...
And Wikipedia IS a very reliable source, don't be stupid "Sentient"
its not a reliable source at all, they deem everyone they don't like a white supremacist, they are very incompetent in terms of research, they forbid people from correcting their misrepresentations etc
They called stefan molyneux and Nick fuentes white supremacist, a anarcho capitalist and a mexican dude.... That's how deranged
Follow the citations at the bottom
I have. Their citations do not support their assertion
Show an example
Stefan molyneux
The white supremacist piece of shit?
Also honorary retard?
watch your language emotional child
Lol "fascist"
Edgy teen
If you cannot hold a coherent debate without refraining from acting like an emotional child you are, this isnt going anywhere
No surprise that you like Stefan
Edgy teen, even if i was a teenager, I still act more mature than you do
GG @Sentient23, you just advanced to level 1!
I don't "like" stefan
I disagree with him on some issues, agree on others
Regardless, you simply calling him names doesnt add towards your point, just shines light on your immaturity and emotional instability
Your pedophile role model is your big example for wikipedia not being credible
You're a joke
Begging the question fallacy