Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 560663607369531394


2019-03-27 01:28:24 UTC  

@MasterJuju Good, I’m going to use you as a caveat as to why I’m actually good goy

2019-03-27 14:14:36 UTC  

I propose the USA pass a minimum corporate tax of 10%. This would mean that no matter how much in write-offs a corporation qualifies for, they would have to pay a minimum of 10% no matter what. This tax would raise hundreds of billions per year while not actually raising the taxe rates on anybody.

2019-03-27 14:17:40 UTC  

What r u talking about

2019-03-27 14:17:51 UTC  

Thats not a minimum tax

2019-03-27 14:17:59 UTC  

Thats a get fked tax

2019-03-27 14:19:04 UTC  

It would discourage write-offs a lot

2019-03-27 14:19:14 UTC  

Which companies already do to sponsor the public.

2019-03-27 14:19:23 UTC  

Corporate scholarships, community-driven centers

2019-03-27 14:19:40 UTC  

Some gone because they can't write off a 10% tax

2019-03-27 14:19:58 UTC  

The government never handles their money properly

2019-03-27 14:20:13 UTC  

They'll buy a hammer and a bucket of nails for $50

2019-03-27 14:41:11 UTC  

@Techpriest You didn't make a very good objection IMO. You're just stating basic talking points of taxes bad because of government waste. Well, society needs taxes for funding things like the military, roads, etc. Yes, corporations do get some write-offs, but I think it's unreasonable when the richest companies are writing their income off to $0. That's not what is intended. So a minimum corporate tax rate at less than half of what the corporate tax rate is at right now, and is less than a third of what the corporate tax rate was before tax cuts is pretty reasonable. Do you really think Amazon should be paying $0 in corporate taxes?

2019-03-27 19:33:45 UTC  

And how do you think amazon pays $0 in corporate tax

2019-03-27 19:57:41 UTC  

Idc about amazon

2019-03-27 19:57:51 UTC  

I care about the stuff I get

2019-03-28 03:04:08 UTC  

@Techpriest Write-offs, obviously, which are good, but I only think they should be allowed to be made to a certain extent. It would be nice if you made an argument we all haven't heard a million times and actually get into the issue a little more in-depth.

2019-03-28 03:04:43 UTC  

@Deleted User do you care about roads? education? military?

2019-03-28 03:06:03 UTC  

Roads ehh somewhat
Education a lot
Military not a lot but I do care

2019-03-28 03:08:07 UTC  

well then you should care about whether Amazon pays $0 in corporate taxes or not

2019-03-28 03:11:27 UTC  

Well I do think what they are doing is bad but I’m not going be like “oh I should stop buying from them”

2019-03-28 03:17:00 UTC  

I’m not a protestor or protesting about it is just I’m not that involved into it, I just think it’s bad that’s what I mean when I said “Idc about Amazon”

2019-03-28 03:36:30 UTC  

Again @atheist4thecause if you don't know how the write-off even occur specifically for amazon

2019-03-28 03:36:36 UTC  

don't bother bitching about muh $0 amazon tax

2019-03-28 06:08:32 UTC  

A Good Military = A Good Country

2019-03-28 06:23:59 UTC  

Good military = Russia

2019-03-28 06:24:32 UTC  

Russia= Not Good Country

2019-03-28 06:31:38 UTC  

The Russian military is shit

2019-03-28 06:31:44 UTC  

i dont think you pay enough attention

2019-03-28 06:38:31 UTC  

Amazon was about to make money for New York @atheist4thecause

2019-03-28 06:38:41 UTC  

But then AOC ruined it

2019-03-28 06:39:04 UTC  

By inventing false news and being a bitch who can't even bar tend

2019-03-28 06:40:10 UTC  

Lol, AOC must be one bad ads bitch for doing all the things she gets blamed for.

2019-03-28 06:43:24 UTC  

@Hechtic She claimed that New York would have to pay like 2 billion for the Amazon deal

2019-03-28 06:43:27 UTC  

Not onlt was that false

2019-03-28 06:43:40 UTC  

But the deal would have given New York 27 billion

2019-03-28 06:51:49 UTC  

Lol. She didn't say that, she did highlight economists outlines of what the deal meant in mid-run economic analysis.

2019-03-28 06:53:56 UTC  

Sorry, she claimed it was "$3 billion we could invest in our district"

2019-03-28 06:54:11 UTC  

Again, $27 billion > $3 billion

2019-03-28 07:08:06 UTC  

When looking at any deal you can not simply look at the single side of the ledger and take that number as the number it would have "given New York"

2019-03-28 07:28:36 UTC  

Another liberal here

2019-03-28 07:28:45 UTC  

When will the horror end