but that doesnt mean war is good
War just shifts the attention from one area to another
less on chronic, more on acute trauma
there is no free lunch, same with credit bubbles
im anti world peace not only because it is impossible but because it is bad for society
look at what the 'fuel race' did, now we are paying for it with carbon emissions
are you an Iron Mountain person?
Im not sure about we being the cause of climate change
GG @Hunter1300, you just advanced to level 4!
be sure about my friend, thermodynamics cannot be cheated
civilization is a heat engine, we can only radiatie away so much waste heat
also without war, humans wouldnt explore space
yeah but I mean humans only produce a little of all carbon on the atmosphere
@tuna hair extensions True
i don't think you need war to explore, the drive to find food etc encourages us to explore
space race
there would be no satellites
we produce a lot of carbon dioxide and many other even more powerful greenhouse gases
not as much as nature itself
we are pushing it beyond what 'nature' would have done, because we can ignore the negative feedback loops built into nature
maybe
no maybe about it
idk man
solar energy is the freebie, and the existing supernova created nuclear fuel. on the waste side, the earth radiates a certain amount of heat away
what if its only another cycle the earth has to go through
it's not, it stacks on top of those
theres something controversial i want to say but i dont want to get smacked
should i say it
Im pro nuclear energy
i am too, but ultimately the real issue is using much less power, from any source
@tuna hair extensions Say it that is what debating is about
we have to use less than the earth can radiate away
@Sh0t true
the heat sink nature of earth must be respected, or we risk destroying all life
basic thermodynamics
ok here i go america existed through mass genocide
im scared now dont kill me
no its kinda true
it's bit more complicated than that, but that had an effect
but well so did all countries
all countries have seen war
