Message from @Apollo
Discord ID: 502388552584265739
So, you said you'd explain my new title? Lol @Dixon Cider Vegan Punisher
You're new title @ZombieQueen
Yeah, my new title.. @Dixon Cider Vegan Punisher
I am lost my friend
Nvm lol
@ZombieQueen tell me now
Lol I just wanted to know why you "my nigga'd" me last night.
ohhhhhhhhh
Cause just like Jesus Christ you're my nigga
Hahah ok cool then. Makes sense I guess. @Dixon Cider Vegan Punisher
Amendments to the gun license laws
Stalin, Hitler and Mao took guns away, remember that
Yep... It's fcked honestly. At a time when crime is soaring and we're constantly seeing headlines of illegal weapons being recovered by criminals not subject to these laws and restrictions, the police struggling to keep up with the crime, the government decides this is a good idea. This is dodge as fck, and deliberate.
Bro trust me, the timing of this is way too (((coincidental))). Imagine if they tried this in America
And I'm in the process of applying for mine for self defense 😔
Bastards
F
Looks like we have to start sharing 3d printer blueprints
It's bullshit though, 3D printed guns won't allow you to be able to defend yourself. They tend to break and fall apart after the first shot, and it probably will still be considered illegal anyways, not to mention you can't print ammunition, so might as well just be in possession of a proper illegal firearm then. 😑
https://youtu.be/6ZV4ApLj5dA this looks like its gonna be a good documentry
Good fuckin luck getting people to hand over their stuff
It's not an exaggeration, I know people who will shoot the police if they try to seize their shit
Yeah that's obviously what they don't want, because they know what they are doing is wrong and will justify it. You know they are serious about land and property theft if they have to disarm the people, even at times of insane crime rates.
Best part is, apparently wanting to defend yourself with a gun is not a valid reason to own a gun
Like, what else fucking reason is there to own a gun? It's the reason ABOVE all other reasons.
Precisely
No the labels given to people just get more extreme while most ideas stay moderate
Not an avid follower of molyneux, but watched a good number of his vids, I don't get cult vibes from him at all. He just has an opinion and uses facts and statistics as variables for his reasoning. That's not exactly cultist behaviour. He seems pro Christian, but by no means a preacher at all, just mostly agreeing with the traditions and ideas. So I think that was maybe more a smear than anything else.
you guys know Black Pigeon Speaks?
Yeah watch some of his stuff too at times. @Ian Adrian Aard but also not subbed to him or a big follower.
How about Paul Joseph Watson? XD
Sounds familiar, can't really put my finger on him right now, but obviously not an avid follower either lol
hahaha, yah he's a bit over the top, but entertaining
No one disputes the idea of checking both sides before crossing lol, have to be an idiot not to. But that said, be careful with labels like that, because if you are willing to accept the possibility without any reason, then you only sabotage your perception with doubts, on a baseless label. Molyneux is not a cultist by any reasonable standard, if he is to be labelled that for simply wanting a following on YouTube and patron support, then every other YouTuber following that very standard practice is a cultist lol. As for tweaking facts, you would need to prove that, and prove that it was deliberate on his part to stray from the source. He tends to make his sources available, and sticks with the source material he provides.
I think it's bad form to allow others to tell you what to think or even presume, especially of someone else and their work. We should be able to reason and judge for ourselves without having someone do it for us. I don't trust people that want to do things for us, even if it's claimed to be with good intentions, because I know very well that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Don't be an NPC lol. Find a means of reasoning that works reliably for you, that you've tested and has not failed you, and stick with that, and just beware of others that have your best interest in mind.
Good grief, excuse my typos lol
Yeah on what level are facts being tweaked though, molyneux isn't doing the study himself, but rather reporting on the information he comes across. So he is only human like anyone else, but until he is caught deliberately fixing facts, I'm hesitant to accuse him of anything. I've seen him adjust his opinions to corrections, so I don't deny that he gets things wrong sometimes. But yeah anyways. Let's be careful
