Either people vassalize to him or they capitulate

So 51% is weak?

And the weak monarchy begins

Yar Capone Is Officially Announcing.... Hes A Libertarian.

ok

The weak monarchy however continues to be weak

simply because there's no way to centralize power

ok

not until the 1600s

@Deleted User yo is that you in your picture ?

You have a tons of nobles always larping

you look like a truck driver

I AM THE TRUE KING

GOD GAVE ME THIS RIGHT TO RULE

@Baby Goku.. Yes

HURR HURR

lol

and whoever was the strongest noble

was therefore the strongest "king"

Is "king"

Oh i get it

everyone is technically

incestuous

so every royal family that larps to be "king"

can claim an ancestor to the first kign

whether it be some retarded 16th cousin or w/e

So in weak, one of the nobels is more powerful but its not "official" And strong has an actial royal family?

in weak, the nobles can always ris eup

and fight the monarchy

So let's say there is Noble A, B, C, D, and E.

ok

Noble A gains the support of B and C and destroys D and E

D and E essentially capitulates

And Noble A reigns as king of their kingdom

however Noble A is always at a risk that B and C could always join the other side

thats why its weak

Noble B could be like I fucking hate A, I could always convince D and E with a little bribery to join my side in a revolt

pretty much it

and then Noble B, D, and E rise up against Noble A and Noble C

and Noble A loses the crown

it happens in china and europe