Chiefs would often pass over their powers to their advisors who could properly lead the tribe

so there's no sense of a monarchy

if you want a monarchy to be inherited that is

a weak monarchy is late-stage libertarianism

a group of people are powerful and wealthly

k

the powerful few

*ok

Now one of these powerful few

decides to rally everybody

udner his dominion

and he does

just **BARELY**

that he nows establishes a weak monarchy

That he maintains a 51% legitimacy across his kingdom

Either people vassalize to him or they capitulate

So 51% is weak?

And the weak monarchy begins

Yar Capone Is Officially Announcing.... Hes A Libertarian.

ok

The weak monarchy however continues to be weak

simply because there's no way to centralize power

ok

not until the 1600s

@Deleted User yo is that you in your picture ?

You have a tons of nobles always larping

you look like a truck driver

I AM THE TRUE KING

GOD GAVE ME THIS RIGHT TO RULE

@Baby Goku.. Yes

HURR HURR

lol

and whoever was the strongest noble

was therefore the strongest "king"

Is "king"

Oh i get it

everyone is technically

incestuous

so every royal family that larps to be "king"

can claim an ancestor to the first kign