So it isn’t really fair to use that

Not so much as a socialist nation

Because then they can control what is being distributed

No but if you would want communism to work you would need to control the world

So that you can produce anything and eve

No you don't

Everything*

It has never been an argument for communism from any side

correct

Communism doesn't exactly stop international trade

Sure but they failed because they couldn’t keep up with their capitalistic peers

But if the had world domination

It might’ve worked

what.

If the world needs to be dominated for something to work then that is bad

The reason the likes of USSR breaking apart is not exactly because of an economic system

That is beyond the point

It goes a bit deeper than that

Wether it’s bad or not

...

GG @Katze Miaulitzer, you just advanced to level 3!

We are talking about if it could work

You need something good not bad

Not ethics and morals

If something needs the whole world to work then it is pretty trash

In what way

Because that makes it weak

Well i'm not an economics expert so if you wanna talk about socialism working then talk to someone like Green Syndicalist

He's done his research i can tell

What do mean by weak

Thanks I’ll speak with him

If it can't be dependent on its own then why is it being used

Cuz it sounds nice to your average joe

Yeah and those ideals will ruin a nation

Or make it very rich

Depending on how it goes

It’s all about luck in this world

Guys get the idea of world domination out of your heads for a second cause that sort of plan doesn't work in the modern world

Yeah if it is based off of luck then it would crash and burn

I'm planning a rant on Grammar and spelling.