come and make me

remove wh*Te imperialists tbh

@Deleted User That's "Lord Emperor Fuhrer Vaati" to you!

Fascism is bad stuff buddy. Some of the worst. Read up a bit more and consider the moral and ethical implications of that kind of regime - as well as long term success (ESPECIALLY in modern society). And just for fun take a look at dictatorial success stories throughout history...

maybe actual fascism, but a lot of """" fascism"""" you hear about today is just butthurt socialists REEEing over anything right of Marx

Sure, sure - people throw words like fascism and Nazi around like hot cakes

I think self-identifying as a "fascist" is pretty bold though...

To say the least ;)

Indeed

Ha ha ha

i suppose, but i view self identifying communists in the same light. so if fascism makes one think of Mussolini or Hitler instantly, then Communism should make you think of Stalin and Mao.

🆙 | **Solid Sar leveled up!**

I just want to turn my country into a fully self sufficient war machine... and live in a respectable clean society

Tbh

so you're imperialist? or just war machine enough to self defend?

GG @Solid Sar, you just advanced to level 1!

Just enough to self defend of course

And be pretty nasty if need be, I don't want constant war

that's fine then. I think it is fine to protect your people, land, and culture from foreigners. although i think native minority groups should be tolerated assuming they are willing to co-exist too

Some do not wish to co exist, but on the main part I agree

well i only mean minorities that come from the area. like in my country we hve 55 officially recognized ethnic minority groups. And for the most part we all co-exist peacefully. but i will not hand out the same willingness of acceptance for immigrant minorities.

(I agree that the communist tag is similarly bold - however at it's "ideal" communism doesn't necessitate dictatorship and removal of Democratic process, whereas fascism does)

Democrats were crying like babies when World Wars 1 and 2 started!

sure, if it is theory VS practice. But every attempt at communism has resulted in a single party socialist state. So if you are going to judge fascism based on the actions of Italy and Germany, then Communism should be judged on the same terms.

Well, in practice both systems have failed. But when judging the ideologies themselves, it's hard to make a case against Democratic choice and for authoritarianism

that's fine to believe that, when comparing theory VS theory. i think you personally are fair in your judgments. but many times i hear other people judge fascism based on what the Nazis and Italians did, but when you bring up Communism they just say none of the attempts were real communism and to look at the theory only.

Like, having a dictator seems like a pretty common sense bad thing. As does having an all-powerful government having full control of everything without checks and balances

Ok I see where you're coming from

It's wise to point out that hypocrisy when possible

How is this still going on

<:laugh:583238348077006869>

idk, i kind of just jumped in when i logged on. i didnt see the full convo

I think it started up again lol

Ebbs and flows like the tide

If anyone dares to call Trump a narc, they are dead to me!

What does narc mean? I thought that was like DEA?

A Narccissist!

Vaati, it seems possible that you could be a bot...I embrace this technological singularity

@Dr.Cosby Only Liberal scumbags call Trump Supporters bots! I'm no bot!

Ah, I thought you meant narcotics, as in DEA.

You could be the first AI and we don't even realize