wait is that who we are talking about?

we're talking about Michel Houellebecq

new book out next month

so hyped

its about the eu

oh well us Frenchies are very serious about sex

im ready for more blatant racism

oh you can just read Aristotle to find racism

i love how Michel Houellebecq can straight up get away with calling blacks the n word

i wish i was so talented at writing i get the n word pass

Aristotle was an interesting bloke. He was an advocate of eugenics

all greeks were more or less

dis is sparda : DDDD heheh

Especially them crazy Spartans

Damn it

2 fast

Spartans make real women

GG @LetThereBeMike, you just advanced to level 1!

200 wpm homie

First way and second way is essentially the same thing, unmoved mover and final cause, how there can't be infinite regress, so there has to be a final cause and an unmoved mover.
Third way is how there has to be a necessary being in order to make contingent things
Fourth way I'm a bit iffy on but what I'm guessing it's his maximally great being argument.
Fifth way is the teleological argument which uses final cause. This is probably the easily refuted, though I also have a refutation of his and anselm's ontological arguments for a maximally great being, lemme get that

@Deleted User why did it take you 10 mins to write a paragraph

@Deleted User can u dm me this stuff cuz i wanna look it up

because I forgot his fourth way

that said

im not a wiki nerd so i'd have to read the book

but i appreciate the gist

Oh man. Philosophy has soooooo much jargon

unironically

Any Rand fans here?

No

Fuck no

She crazy

<:laugh:583238348077006869>

She is brilliant

the only annoying thing about philosophy is that philosophers tend to change the definition of words

like hegel

Materialism and dualism have different definitions in philosophy from general use

Just makes everything more complicated

It's not an easy to approach subject

I see why people are put off

well