Message from @sticky

Discord ID: 610594345577349120


2019-08-12 22:02:59 UTC  

its £3

2019-08-12 22:03:00 UTC  

im serious

2019-08-12 22:03:02 UTC  

buy it rn

2019-08-12 22:03:04 UTC  

<:PeepoChrist:583237123126329344>

2019-08-12 22:03:06 UTC  

u'll read it in a day, its amazing

2019-08-12 22:03:07 UTC  

1) Being ontologically prior to a set with the highest cardinality is a great-making property.
2) There does not exist a set with the highest cardinality.
3) Therefore, one cannot be ontologically prior to the set with the greatest cardinality.
4) Therefore, a being cannot be maximally great.

@sticky

2019-08-12 22:03:24 UTC  

Uh

2019-08-12 22:03:31 UTC  

<:brainlet:591247546689519616>

2019-08-12 22:03:33 UTC  

its £3 on ebay dude

2019-08-12 22:03:40 UTC  

use fucking libgen

2019-08-12 22:03:43 UTC  

no

2019-08-12 22:03:44 UTC  

buy it

2019-08-12 22:03:45 UTC  

yes

2019-08-12 22:03:46 UTC  

Leave me alone <:PeepoChrist:583237123126329344>

2019-08-12 22:03:46 UTC  

fuck ebooks

2019-08-12 22:03:47 UTC  

no

2019-08-12 22:03:48 UTC  

wtf

2019-08-12 22:03:50 UTC  

wait 3 pounds

2019-08-12 22:03:51 UTC  

How dare you

2019-08-12 22:03:54 UTC  

efukt

2019-08-12 22:03:56 UTC  

ebooks in 2019

2019-08-12 22:03:59 UTC  

fuck you

2019-08-12 22:04:03 UTC  

wait im reading what u wrote @Deleted User

2019-08-12 22:04:06 UTC  

ok

2019-08-12 22:04:11 UTC  

It's not made by me btw

2019-08-12 22:04:19 UTC  

But it's taken from set theory

2019-08-12 22:04:31 UTC  

yeah im not gonna lie

2019-08-12 22:04:38 UTC  

im not familiar with any of this

2019-08-12 22:04:47 UTC  

~~same~~

2019-08-12 22:04:51 UTC  

For all I know

2019-08-12 22:05:01 UTC  

He could be pulling this straight out of his arse

2019-08-12 22:05:09 UTC  

And I wouldn't know any better<:laugh:583238348077006869>

2019-08-12 22:05:26 UTC  

An agnostic friend posted it

2019-08-12 22:05:32 UTC  

@Deleted User 1) Being ontologically prior to a set with the highest cardinality is a great-making property. can u explain this?

2019-08-12 22:05:48 UTC  

The jargon is unreal

2019-08-12 22:05:52 UTC  

It's worse than maths

2019-08-12 22:06:00 UTC  

so he's saying that without any religious status you are of great status inherently because you are untouched?

2019-08-12 22:06:08 UTC  

brb lemme go back and look at his explanation

2019-08-12 22:06:11 UTC  

ok

2019-08-12 22:06:13 UTC  

im interested