they hunted the megafauna to extinction

"wasn't sustainable"? humans lived in it for hundreds of thousands of years

well there was a point where humans advanced too much

your average small english farming community in the high middle ages had the homicide rates of like african warzones today

funfact: they never hunted the megafauna to extinction in africa

they didn't reach that point

natural resolves itself, if there are too many humans then some will die off

There was a critical mass where people got too good at hunting to where they had to settle down and grow food.

to supplement themselves

well now you're just discussing the supposed inevitability of settled agriculture, but we're not discussing that it happened and will happen but are discussing recognising that it sucks balls

GG @WP, you just advanced to level 5!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TkFmmdmk50

get redpilled

Animal husbandry allowed people to get the same benefits as hunting while living in a settled lifestyle

they just had too many babies and lived to close to animals

right but what point are you making?

that serfdom with animal husbandry is based and redpilled

but they lived miserable lives

not really

humans live more fulfilling lives as nomads and hunter gatherers

or whatever comes of industrial civilisation

what do you mean by "not really"? malnutrition, regular famines, oppression - we're talking about a people who repeatedly rose up and fought for freedom even though they knew they had previously been crushed

they didn't really rise up that much

it was mostly just nobles that fought other nobles for control over them

we can see the physical effects too from looking at skulls where they all had fucked up teeth. the superior chad jaws of hunter gatherers is testament to the true natural lifestyle man is made for

no cavemen needed braces, they had perfect teeth. serfs were all mouthbreathing chinless virgins

their teeth would have only been bad in cities

people in rural areas have almost always had immaculate teeth historically

why would that be? the people in cities were richer and suffered less from malnutrition

based on what do you say that?

even in african villages they had perfect teeth

these people lived off mostly grain

like the romans they had collapsed mouth breather faces

i think you're going with a lot of naive romanticism

no

the nobility would've lived quite well, but for most people the feudal system sucked

there's a reason they had to outlaw suicide and say you were going to be punished eternally for it

the nobility would have been the ones with terrible teeth for the most part

since they ate white bread and lots of sugar

the nobility were the ones who had good diets and ate meat

talking about high middle ages