the peasants revolt LOST, they were rounded up and executed in their thousands and richard ii sat on the throne

but he couldn't raise taxes

he couldn't clamp down on the peasants

because it would cause another revolt

elites can fail and they will always be replaced by another elite

simple as

how was henry iv bad?

good and bad are meaningless, there is only strong and weak

richard ii is killed by henry iv, henry iv is one of the greatest kings who was a king of the people

yes and you're on the side of weak

stagnation and parasites

you're on the side of decay and decadence

parasites are weak but they still can rule

gluttony is not strong

how am i on the side of decay and decadence?

it takes strength and discipline to resist temptation

what temptation haven't i resisted? lol

nowhere do i argue to give into temptation

you're a national socialist?

i mean, you claim to be lol

you pretend to be a national socialist lol

Not all of them are the same

you mean there is meme understandings then there is actual national socialist philosophy

national socialist philosophy is not on your side

what do you consider a national socialist

national socialist philosophy is concerned with biological essentialism and a people having a leader, not a ruler

not inherently

that's not true

that society is a social organism, not a bureaucratic machine

it is the bolsheviks who wanted to engineer society, just like the in the spirit of the feudal nobility and the catholic church

national socialism only means what it says

it's a combination of words

socialism on a national level

lol you're so wrong

Okay what is this cringe I just walked into?

@WP I mean if you take it literally then he’s correct

Bruv

That was a marathon

;(((

Хай

Го говорить