Message from @WP
Discord ID: 624102705073487897
how did any elite benefit from so many of these rebellions?
sometimes peasants can be elites, they just aren't usually very elite when compared to other elites
they went and fought and killed elites, and then usually were hunted down and killed
and they die
but 5 years later, 10 years later, they have made a difference because the eliteswere afraid
there is no such thing as a society without elites
the peasants revolt LOST, they were rounded up and executed in their thousands and richard ii sat on the throne
but he couldn't raise taxes
he couldn't clamp down on the peasants
because it would cause another revolt
elites can fail and they will always be replaced by another elite
simple as
how was henry iv bad?
good and bad are meaningless, there is only strong and weak
richard ii is killed by henry iv, henry iv is one of the greatest kings who was a king of the people
yes and you're on the side of weak
stagnation and parasites
you're on the side of decay and decadence
parasites are weak but they still can rule
gluttony is not strong
it takes strength and discipline to resist temptation
what temptation haven't i resisted? lol
nowhere do i argue to give into temptation
you're a national socialist?
i mean, you claim to be lol
you pretend to be a national socialist lol
Not all of them are the same
you mean there is meme understandings then there is actual national socialist philosophy
national socialist philosophy is not on your side
what do you consider a national socialist
national socialist philosophy is concerned with biological essentialism and a people having a leader, not a ruler
not inherently
that's not true
that society is a social organism, not a bureaucratic machine
it is the bolsheviks who wanted to engineer society, just like the in the spirit of the feudal nobility and the catholic church
national socialism only means what it says
it's a combination of words
socialism on a national level
lol you're so wrong
Okay what is this cringe I just walked into?